Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + HC Service Tax - 2023 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (2) TMI 610 - HC - Service Tax


Issues:
Challenge to show cause notice under Sabka Vishwas Scheme regarding service tax eligibility based on investigation status.

Analysis:

1. Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme Application: The petitioner, a private limited company engaged in construction and development, applied under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, for relief from tax dues and waiver of interest and penalty. The petitioner declared an amount under Work Contract Service and received a discharge certificate upon payment as per the scheme's provisions.

2. Show Cause Notice: Subsequently, the petitioner received a show cause notice demanding payment of service tax due, citing an ongoing investigation by the Director General of GST Intelligence. The notice challenged the petitioner's eligibility under the voluntary declaration scheme and demanded a significant amount from the petitioner.

3. Legal Interpretation: The court analyzed the relevant sections of the Finance Act, 2019, concerning the issuance of discharge certificates and the consequences of false declarations. The petitioner argued that only the Designated Committee could determine the falsity of declarations post-issuance of the discharge certificate, while the respondents contended that the committee's role ceased after issuance.

4. Court's Decision: The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing that the show cause notice was unwarranted as the declarations were not false. Referring to previous judgments, the court highlighted that investigations must be pending as of a specific date for disqualification under the voluntary disclosure category. Since no inquiry or investigation was ongoing against the petitioner before the relevant date, the court held that the petitioner was eligible to apply under the scheme.

5. Conclusion: Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, making the rule absolute in favor of the petitioner, with no order as to costs. The judgment underscores the importance of adherence to legal provisions and the significance of investigating the eligibility criteria under such schemes before issuing show cause notices.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates