9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (3) TMI 101 - AT - Income TaxTDS u/s 194C OR 194I - deductibility of TDS on rent and CAM - AR has submitted that payment of CAM charges is nothing but reimbursement of common area maintenance expenses incurred by the lessor on general maintenance, electric, water and security services etc. - HELD THAT - We find that the issue of deductibility of tax on rent and CAM was examined by the Tribunal in the case of Connaught Plaza Restaurants P. Ltd. 2022 (1) TMI 409 - ITAT DELHI , Lifestyle International Pvt. Ltd. 2022 (5) TMI 1335 - ITAT BANGALORE and 2022 (4) TMI 1278 - ITAT BANGALORE and also by the order of this bench in the case of Yum Restaurants India (P) Ltd. 2022 (10) TMI 256 - ITAT DELHI Thus we hold that rent is subjected to TDS @ 10% u/s 194-I and CAM charges u/s 194-C @ 2%. Hence, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed.
Issues:
1. Treatment of CAM charges as rent charges under sections 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Short deduction of TDS on CAM charges under section 194-I instead of section 194C. 3. Interest on short deduction of TDS on CAM charges under section 201(1A). Issue 1: Treatment of CAM charges as rent charges The appeal was filed against the order of the ld. CIT(A) treating CAM charges as rent charges and confirming a demand under sections 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. A survey revealed that Mall owners collected CAM charges subject to TDS at 2% under section 194-C. The AO contended that TDS should have been at 10% under section 194-I, issuing a show cause notice. The assessee argued separate invoices for lease expenses and CAM charges, but the AO disagreed, citing the broad definition of rent under section 194-I. The assessee maintained that CAM charges were for services, not for the use of land or building. Issue 2: Short deduction of TDS on CAM charges The assessee paid rent and CAM charges to different parties based on separate agreements. The AO made additions for short deduction of TDS without adequate hearing. The assessee argued that CAM charges were not for the use of land or building, falling outside section 194-I. The assessee cited Supreme Court judgments and contractual distinctions between rent and CAM charges. However, the ld. CIT(A) held that CAM charges were part of rent under section 194-I due to a single lease agreement covering both payments. Issue 3: Interest on short deduction of TDS on CAM charges The AO's order included interest under section 201(1A) for short deduction of TDS. The assessee contended that CAM charges were not rent under section 194-I, thus challenging the interest levy. The ld. CIT(A) upheld the interest levy based on the single lease agreement encompassing rent and CAM charges. The Tribunal referred to previous judgments distinguishing rent and CAM charges, concluding that rent was subject to TDS under section 194-I, while CAM charges fell under section 194-C. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the order favored the assessee. In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment clarified the distinction between rent and CAM charges, affirming that CAM charges were not subject to TDS under section 194-I but under section 194-C. The decision highlighted the importance of separate agreements and the nature of expenses incurred, ultimately allowing the assessee's appeal.
|
