9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (5) TMI 110 - AT - Income TaxUnaccounted job work received - CIT(A) restricting the addition made by the AO by estimating the profit @ 20% on unaccounted job receipts to consider 5% as net profit as income for the year under consideration - HELD THAT - As this Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in Betex India Ltd.whereby the issue under consideration relating to addition in respect of unaccounted job work received were discussed and adjudicated , wherein 5% of alleged unaccounted job work addition was confirmed. As the issue is squarely covered in favour of assessee by the order in Betex India Ltd. group cases 2022 (12) TMI 1403 - ITAT SURAT and there is no change in facts and law and the Revenue is unable to produce any material to controvert the aforesaid findings - we dismiss the Revenue s appeal.
Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the order u/s 154 of the Act dated 31.12.2021. 2. Reinstatement of the appeal by CIT(A) u/s 154. 3. Restriction of addition by CIT(A) to 5% of unaccounted job receipts. 4. Reasonableness of net profit rate of 5% on job work receipts. 5. Reliance on judicial pronouncements for estimating profit. 6. Prayer to set aside the order of CIT(A) and restore that of AO. 7. Additional grounds of appeal. Summary: Issue 1: Validity of the order u/s 154 of the Act dated 31.12.2021 The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in passing an order u/s 154 of the Act manually without generating a DIN and not regularizing it within 15 working days, making the order invalid and non-est. Issue 2: Reinstatement of the appeal by CIT(A) u/s 154 The CIT(A) reinstated the appeal by passing an order u/s 154 dated 31.12.2021, which was initially dismissed as withdrawn on 28.12.2020. The Revenue argued that there were no enabling facts or circumstances for such reinstatement. Issue 3: Restriction of addition by CIT(A) to 5% of unaccounted job receipts The CIT(A) restricted the addition made by the AO from Rs.2,00,41,167/- (20% of unaccounted job receipts) to Rs.50,10,292/- (5% of unaccounted job receipts), considering it reasonable. Issue 4: Reasonableness of net profit rate of 5% on job work receipts The CIT(A) held that a net profit rate of 5% on job work receipts was reasonable, contrary to the AO's estimation of 20% based on comparisons with similar businesses and essential expenses. Issue 5: Reliance on judicial pronouncements for estimating profit The CIT(A) relied on judicial pronouncements for estimating the profit, which the Revenue argued did not consider the overall facts and modus operandi of earning unaccounted income unearthed during search proceedings. Issue 6: Prayer to set aside the order of CIT(A) and restore that of AO The Revenue prayed for the order of CIT(A) to be set aside and the AO's order to be restored. Judgment: The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, stating that the issue of addition in respect of unaccounted job work receipts was squarely covered by the Tribunal's earlier decision in Betex India Ltd. group cases, where a 5% addition was confirmed. The Tribunal found no reason to deviate from this precedent. Regarding grounds 1 and 2 related to Section 154, the Tribunal noted that these were not adjudicated as the Revenue had not filed an appeal against the order u/s 154. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 31/03/2023.
|
