Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (6) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (6) TMI 345 - AT - Income TaxTaxability of reimbursement of various expenses - ' reimbursements' from various entities on account of the provision of facilities and services of seismic data acquisition, planning and carrying out of presurvey studies, taking marine data and confirming prospects, maintenance/upgradation/support of software licences, etc. ('services') - taxable u/s 44DA or u/s 44BB - Difference of opinion between the Learned AM and Learned JM of ITAT, C Bench, New Delhi - matter referred third member of ITAT for consideration and disposal u/s. 255(4) - Assessee is a non-resident company having permanent establishment in India. Third member concluded that revenue received by the assessee-company during the year under consideration on account of provision of facilities and services of seismic data acquisition, planning and carrying out of pre-survey study, taking marine data and confirming prospects, maintenance/ upgradation/support of software licences, etc., is not in the nature of fees for technical services as the same is covered by the exclusion provided in Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vii) of the Act being consideration received for mining or like projects and the same, therefore, is not taxable under section 44DA and revenue received for the same accordingly is taxable under section 44BB of the Act. And amount received by the assessee as reimbursement of service tax is not includible in gross turnover for the purpose of computing taxable income under section 44BB of the Act. HELD THAT - As decided by Learned third member revenue received by the assessee company during the year under consideration on account of provision of facilities and services of seismic data acquisition, planning and carrying out of pre-survey study, taking marine data and confirming prospects, maintenance/ upgradation / support of software licenses, etc, is not in the nature of fees for technical services as the same is covered by the exclusion provided in Explanation (2) to Section 9 (1) (vii) of the Act being consideration received for mining or like projects and the same, therefore, is not taxable under Section 44DA of the Act. The said services or facilities provided by the assessee actually are inextricably connected with prospecting for, or extraction or production of, mineral oils as held in the case of ONGC 2017 (10) TMI 322 - SUPREME COURT under the similar facts and circumstances and the revenue received for the same accordingly is taxable under Section 44BB of the Act. Whether, the amount received as reimbursement of service tax includible in gross turnover for the purpose of computing taxable income u/s 44BB ? - This issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Hon ble Uttarakhand High Court in the case of Director of Income-tax International Taxation Vs. Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. 2019 (4) TMI 1177 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT wherein it was held that the amount reimbursed to assessee (service provider) by ONGC (service recipient), representing service tax paid earlier by assessee to Government of India, not being an amount paid to assessee on account of providing services and facilities in connection with prospecting for, or extraction or production of, mineral oils in India, would not form part of aggregate amount referred to in clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 44BB of the Act. Thus amount received by the assessee in the present case as reimbursement of service tax is not including in the gross turnover for the purpose of computing taxable income u/s 44BB. In the light of the decision of the learned third member the captioned cross appeals are decided in favour of the assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of revenue received by the assessee under section 44BB or section 44DA read with section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act. 2. Inclusion of reimbursement of service tax in gross turnover for computing taxable income under section 44BB. Summary: Issue 1: Taxability of Revenue under Section 44BB or Section 44DA The primary issue was whether the revenue received by the assessee for providing facilities and services such as seismic data acquisition, pre-survey studies, marine data collection, and software maintenance should be taxed under section 44BB or section 44DA read with section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee claimed that these services were inextricably linked to oil extraction and thus should be taxed under section 44BB, which applies to services connected with the prospecting for or extraction of mineral oils. The Assessing Officer, however, treated the income as "fees for technical services" (FTS) under section 9(1)(vii) and taxed it under section 44DA. The Tribunal, after considering the nature of services and relevant judicial precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in ONGC Ltd. v. CIT, held that the services provided by the assessee were indeed connected with the prospecting for or extraction of mineral oils. Therefore, the income from these services was not in the nature of FTS and should be taxed under section 44BB. The Tribunal emphasized that the amendments to sections 44BB and 44DA by the Finance Act, 2010, did not alter the fundamental nature and applicability of section 44BB for services connected with mining or like projects. Issue 2: Inclusion of Reimbursement of Service Tax in Gross Turnover The second issue was whether the amount received as reimbursement of service tax should be included in the gross turnover for computing taxable income under section 44BB. The Tribunal, agreeing with the decisions of the Uttarakhand High Court and the Delhi High Court, held that service tax collected by the assessee is not part of the income and should not be included in the gross receipts for the purpose of computing income under section 44BB. This is because the service tax collected is a statutory liability and does not form part of the consideration for the services provided. Conclusion: The Tribunal concluded that the revenue received by the assessee for the services provided should be taxed under section 44BB, not section 44DA, and that the reimbursement of service tax should not be included in the gross turnover for computing taxable income under section 44BB.
|