Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + HC Service Tax - 2023 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (7) TMI 953 - HC - Service Tax


Issues involved:
The judgment involves the challenge to Circular No. 80/10/2004-ST dated 17 September 2004 regarding the service tax leviable on "survey and exploration of minerals." The issues include the expansion of the provision's ambit, interpretation of the provision in light of subsequent legislative amendments, and the legality of a show cause notice issued to a specific member.

Details of the judgment:

1. The petitioners, an association of drilling contractors, challenged Circular No. 80/10/2004-ST, arguing that it wrongly brought prospecting of minerals under taxable entry Section 65(105)(zzv) of the Finance Act, 1994.

2. The petitioners contended that their drilling work contracts with ONGC and Reliance Industries Ltd. did not fall under "survey and exploration of minerals" as defined, and the circular expanded the provision beyond legislative intent.

3. The petitioners' Senior Counsel noted that since 2007, their members were taxed under "mining services," except for one member issued a show cause notice in 2008, which raised legal and factual concerns not addressed by the department.

4. The case was listed for final hearing, with prayers seeking a declaration that charter hire of vessels for drilling is not taxable under the circular, and to quash the circular and related show cause notices.

5. The Court observed that the department had not issued show cause notices to most petitioners' members for 17 years, and the petitioners continued paying service tax under "mining services."

6. Considering the association nature of the petitioners, the Court deemed it inappropriate to examine the circular's validity, as it was subject to a show cause notice to one member who could raise all contentions before the Designated Officer.

7. The judgment ordered that all contentions of petitioners' members could be raised before Departmental Authorities if needed, especially for the member issued the show cause notice in 2008.

8. The Court disposed of the petition, keeping all contentions open for further adjudication by the Departmental Authorities, without awarding any costs to either party.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates