9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (9) TMI 164 - AAR - GSTScope of supply - subsidized canteen facility - Part of the cost deducted by the applicant from its employees, who are availing food in the factory - section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 - HELD THAT - In terms of Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017, supply means all forms of supply of goods/services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business. The exception being Schedule I, which includes the activities made or agreed to be made without a consideration and Schedule III, which includes activities which shall be treated neither as a supply of goods or services. The applicant s case is that they employ more than 250 employees including contract workers in their factory and that they have been provided with canteen facility in terms of section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948. The subsidized deduction made by the applicant from the employees who are availing food in the factory would not be considered as a supply under the provisions of section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017. However, the aforementioned finding is only in respect of employees i.e. permanent employees. Contract worker s portion of canteen charges - HELD THAT - The contractual worker in the factory is primarily engaged for carrying out the activity which is either directly or indirectly related to manufacturing activity. The contractual worker in the instant case, is under scope of definition of Worker stipulated under Section 2(l) to be read with Section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948 - The applicant has entered into agreement with Contractor to provide them workers in lieu of consideration. The applicant has paid the agreed amount to the contractor and the contractor pays the salary/wages to such contract workers. Therefore, it evident that the instant case does not pass the test of employer-employee relationship as far as the contract workers and the applicant is concerned and therefore does not fall within the ambit of entry 1 of Schedule III of CGST Act, 2017. The applicant has established canteen facilities as mandated under section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948 and supplies food at a subsidized cost through CSP. The supply of food by the applicant is supply of service by the applicant to their contractual worker/s. the cost, which is recovered from the salary of contractual worker, as deferred payment is consideration for the supply and GST is liable to be paid. The principal employer is also cast the responsibility of providing the canteen facility to the contract labourer and that such responsibility is not solely cast upon the contractor; that the applicant in this case only undertakes to provide maintain canteen facilities to the contact workers. We have gone through the concerned sections and the rules - it is clear that this is a contract entered into by the applicant with the contractor and not with the contract workers. Even otherwise, the onus shifts to the principal employer ie the applicant only in case of failure of the contractor to provide such facility. Nothing is brought on record to exhibit that the contractor who supplied workers to the applicant, in this case, failed to provide the canteen facilities. The averment therefore is not legally tenable. The recovery of amount from contractual worker on account of third party canteen services provided by the applicant would fall within the ambit of the definition of outward supply as per section 2(83) of the CGST Act, 2017 and therefore, is liable to tax as a supply under GST. Input Tax Credit - ITC of GST charged by the CSP would be eligible for availment by the applicant - HELD THAT - ITC will be available to the appellant in respect of food and beverages as canteen facility is obligatorily to be provided under the Factories Act, 1948, read with Gujarat Factories Rules, 1963 as far as provision of canteen service for full time/direct employees working on permanent basis at the factory is concerned. It is further held that the ITC on GST charged by the canteen service provider will be restricted to the extent of cost borne by the appellant only. ITC on canteen charges on the food supplied to contractual worker - HELD THAT - The provision of Chapter V of CLRA stipulates that labour contractor shall provide the canteen facility to the labour employed by the contractor. Thus, there is no direct mandate to the applicant company to provide canteen facility to the contractual worker - In the instant case the applicant company and contractual workers, do not fall within the ambit of employer-employee relationship and further, it is not obligatory on the applicant company to provide canteen facility to the contractual worker as per provisions of CLRA Act. Section 17(5) allows ITC on food, beverages outdoor catering only in case it is obligatory under any law for the time being in force. Thus applicant is not eligible of ITC on the food supplied by CSP to contractual worker and it is blocked under Section 17(5) (b) of CGST Act, 2017 - applicant is not eligible to the ITC on food supplied to the contractual worker under Section 17 (5) (b) of CGST Act, 2017.
Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of GST on the amount recovered/collected from employees and contract workers for canteen services. 2. Eligibility to avail Input Tax Credit (ITC) of GST charged by the Canteen Service Provider (CSP). Summary: 1. GST on Amount Recovered from Employees: The applicant provides canteen facilities to employees as mandated by Section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948. The applicant argued that the recovery of canteen charges from employees is not a "supply" under GST as it is a statutory requirement and not a commercial activity. The ruling held that the subsidized deduction made from employees for canteen services is not considered a "supply" under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017. Thus, GST is not applicable on the amount representing the employees' portion of canteen charges collected by the applicant. 2. GST on Amount Recovered from Contract Workers: The applicant also provides canteen facilities to contract workers and recovers part of the cost from them. The ruling clarified that contract workers do not fall under the "employee" category as they are not on the company's payroll. The supply of food to contract workers is considered a "supply" under Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017, and is subject to GST. Therefore, GST is applicable on the amount representing the contract workers' portion of canteen charges collected by the applicant. 3. Eligibility to Avail ITC for Employees: The applicant sought to avail ITC on GST paid to the CSP for canteen services provided to employees. The ruling referred to Section 17(5)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017, and clarified that ITC is available where it is obligatory for an employer to provide such services under any law. Since the applicant is mandated to provide canteen facilities under the Factories Act, 1948, ITC on GST charged by the CSP is admissible for the canteen services provided to direct employees. However, ITC is restricted to the extent of the cost borne by the applicant. 4. Eligibility to Avail ITC for Contract Workers: The ruling discussed the applicability of ITC on canteen services provided to contract workers. It was noted that the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, mandates the contractor to provide canteen facilities to contract workers. Since there is no direct mandate on the applicant to provide such facilities and the applicant and contract workers do not share an employer-employee relationship, ITC on canteen services provided to contract workers is not admissible under Section 17(5)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017. Ruling: 1. GST is not leviable on the amount representing the employees' portion of canteen charges collected by the applicant. 2. GST is leviable on the amount representing the contract workers' portion of canteen charges collected by the applicant. 3. ITC on GST charged by the CSP is available for canteen services provided to direct employees, restricted to the cost borne by the applicant. 4. ITC on GST paid on canteen facilities for contract workers is not admissible.
|
