Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2023 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (10) TMI 294 - AT - Customs


Issues:
- Import of Viscose Soft Waste without required permission
- Confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties under Section 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962

Import of Viscose Soft Waste without required permission:
The case involved six appeals arising from common impugned order-in-appeal dated 30.10.2019. Three appellants imported Viscose Soft Waste without obtaining necessary permission from Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change as per Hazardous and Other Wastes Rules, 2016. The original authority confiscated the goods and directed re-export without imposing any redemption fine. Penalties were imposed on the appellants under Section 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the original authority's orders, leading to the appeals before the Tribunal.

Confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties:
The learned counsel for the appellant argued that similar goods had been previously cleared, indicating no intention to contravene laws. All appellants paid penalties and re-exported the goods. Citing precedent cases, the counsel contended that penalties are not applicable when goods are re-exported. The Revenue argued that the imposed penalties were justified. The Tribunal noted the past clearances of similar goods and the re-exportation by the appellants. Referring to the Siemens Public Communication Networks Ltd. case, it held that penalties under Customs Act were not warranted when goods were re-exported. Consequently, all penalties imposed under Section 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.

Separate Judgement:
No separate judgment was delivered by the judges in this case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates