Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + HC Service Tax - 2023 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (11) TMI 899 - HC - Service Tax


Issues Involved:

1. Compliance with the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme (SVLDRS), 2019.
2. Extension of time for payment under SVLDRS due to COVID-19 pandemic.
3. Validity of rejection of representation by the Board.

Summary:

1. Compliance with the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme (SVLDRS), 2019:
The petitioner, a former partner of a dissolved company, exercised the option under SVLDRS, 2019, by filing an application on 28.12.2019. The third respondent accepted the application and issued SVLDRS Form-3 on 27.02.2020, quantifying the payable amount at Rs. 3,17,090/-. The petitioner failed to make the payment by the extended due date of 30.06.2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent financial difficulties.

2. Extension of time for payment under SVLDRS due to COVID-19 pandemic:
The petitioner believed the due date was extended to 30.09.2020 based on a government notification dated 27.06.2020. However, the competent authority rejected the petitioner's request for an extension. The petitioner then filed W.P.No.14454 of 2020, and the Court directed the petitioner to remit the balance amount with 15% interest from 01.07.2020. The petitioner complied and made the payment on 25.06.2021. The Court allowed the writ petition, permitting the petitioner to make a representation for acceptance of his application under SVLDRS, which the Board was directed to consider.

3. Validity of rejection of representation by the Board:
Despite the Court's direction, the Board rejected the petitioner's representation on 27.08.2021. The respondents argued that the petitioner failed to make the payment within the stipulated time, thus rendering the declaration lapsed. The Court noted that the SVLDRS scheme's provisions are directory, not mandatory, allowing for extensions due to the pandemic. The Court highlighted that the respondents did not appeal the prior orders permitting the petitioner to make the payment under the scheme. Consequently, the rejection of the representation was deemed unreasonable and set aside.

Conclusion:
The Court directed the respondents to issue Form SVLDRS-4 to the petitioner within 30 days, discharging the tax liabilities under the scheme. The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned order dated 27.08.2021 was set aside.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates