Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2024 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (1) TMI 841 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:

1. Adjustments to international transactions pertaining to software development, IT-enabled services, marketing support services, and employee stock option plan expenses.
2. Determination of arm's length price (ALP) for software development services, IT-enabled services, and marketing support services.
3. Inclusion and exclusion of certain companies in the final set of comparable companies.
4. Working capital adjustment to the Profit Level Indicator (PLI).
5. Deduction of education cess.

Summary:

Issue 1: Adjustments to International Transactions

The learned Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment under section 144C(13) read with section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, making adjustments to the international transactions. The total income was assessed at INR 276,61,63,621 against the returned income of INR 194,22,84,460.

Issue 2: Determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP)

Software Development Services:
Grounds 1.2 to 1.5 were not pressed by the assessee and hence dismissed.

Marketing Support Services:
The assessee rendered marketing support services to its associate enterprise on a cost-plus basis, with a margin of 11%. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) included Axis Integrated Systems Limited in the final list of comparables, which the assessee objected to, arguing it was not functionally comparable. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld the TPO's decision. However, the ITAT, following its previous decision for the assessee's own case, directed the exclusion of Axis Integrated Systems Limited from the list of comparables.

Employee Stock Option Plans:
Grounds 1.9 and 1.10 were not pressed by the assessee and hence dismissed.

Working Capital Adjustment:
Ground 1.11 was not pressed by the assessee and hence dismissed.

Deduction of Education Cess:
Ground 1.12 was not pressed by the assessee and hence dismissed.

Additional Grounds:

The assessee filed additional grounds to exclude Killick Agencies and Marketing Limited and Majestic Research Services and Solutions Limited from the list of comparables due to functional dissimilarity. The ITAT, considering the functional differences and judicial precedents, directed the exclusion of these companies from the list of comparables.

Conclusion:

The appeal was partly allowed, with specific directions to exclude certain companies from the list of comparables for determining the ALP for marketing support services. The additional grounds filed by the assessee were also allowed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates