9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Delay in shipment of unaccompanied baggage, refusal of clearance, transfer of residence concession. Analysis: The petitioner sought a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to challenge the delay in the shipment of his unaccompanied baggage from Saudi Arabia, which arrived in India after 267 days. The petitioner had left Saudi Arabia due to the war in 1990 and entrusted his goods to a friend for shipment. The authorities refused clearance due to the delay. The second respondent found the delay unsatisfactory and denied transfer of residence concession. The first respondent upheld this decision, leading to the writ petition. The petitioner's counsel argued that the extraordinary circumstances of the war in Saudi Arabia justified the delay. The petitioner had no means to expedite the shipment personally and had to rely on friends. Similar cases where delays were condoned were cited to support the petitioner's claim for concession. The authorities were urged to consider the petitioner's hardships during the war and grant the concession. The government's counsel contended that the delay was substantial, and the petitioner should have acted promptly to seek the concession. The court carefully considered both arguments and acknowledged the petitioner's constrained situation during the war. It was noted that the petitioner had taken reasonable steps by entrusting the goods to a friend for shipment. The court found the authorities had not adequately considered the petitioner's explanation for the delay and set aside their decision. The impugned orders were quashed, and the writ petition was allowed without costs. The court directed the first respondent to issue appropriate orders within twelve weeks for the transfer of residence concession and clearance of the goods, recognizing the petitioner's circumstances during the war in Saudi Arabia.
|
