Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2006 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (6) TMI 3 - AT - Service Tax


  1. 2015 (5) TMI 249 - SC
  2. 2008 (4) TMI 31 - SC
  3. 2019 (8) TMI 636 - HC
  4. 2017 (12) TMI 286 - HC
  5. 2015 (7) TMI 856 - HC
  6. 2013 (4) TMI 45 - HC
  7. 2012 (4) TMI 327 - HC
  8. 2012 (9) TMI 337 - HC
  9. 2011 (4) TMI 542 - HC
  10. 2010 (5) TMI 507 - HC
  11. 2010 (5) TMI 756 - HC
  12. 2009 (11) TMI 104 - HC
  13. 2008 (7) TMI 397 - HC
  14. 2008 (7) TMI 1060 - HC
  15. 2008 (2) TMI 37 - HC
  16. 2024 (2) TMI 1307 - AT
  17. 2023 (11) TMI 613 - AT
  18. 2023 (11) TMI 222 - AT
  19. 2022 (9) TMI 1060 - AT
  20. 2019 (10) TMI 538 - AT
  21. 2019 (8) TMI 1302 - AT
  22. 2019 (6) TMI 1452 - AT
  23. 2019 (6) TMI 629 - AT
  24. 2018 (10) TMI 475 - AT
  25. 2018 (8) TMI 701 - AT
  26. 2018 (8) TMI 700 - AT
  27. 2018 (7) TMI 1535 - AT
  28. 2018 (3) TMI 1679 - AT
  29. 2018 (1) TMI 981 - AT
  30. 2018 (1) TMI 493 - AT
  31. 2017 (12) TMI 1098 - AT
  32. 2017 (10) TMI 289 - AT
  33. 2017 (3) TMI 1153 - AT
  34. 2017 (1) TMI 39 - AT
  35. 2016 (12) TMI 538 - AT
  36. 2016 (12) TMI 596 - AT
  37. 2016 (8) TMI 948 - AT
  38. 2015 (9) TMI 53 - AT
  39. 2014 (10) TMI 135 - AT
  40. 2014 (11) TMI 751 - AT
  41. 2014 (8) TMI 784 - AT
  42. 2013 (12) TMI 1023 - AT
  43. 2013 (9) TMI 1049 - AT
  44. 2014 (3) TMI 336 - AT
  45. 2014 (3) TMI 335 - AT
  46. 2014 (1) TMI 994 - AT
  47. 2013 (5) TMI 930 - AT
  48. 2013 (7) TMI 349 - AT
  49. 2014 (1) TMI 668 - AT
  50. 2014 (1) TMI 1146 - AT
  51. 2013 (8) TMI 566 - AT
  52. 2014 (8) TMI 26 - AT
  53. 2013 (6) TMI 262 - AT
  54. 2014 (5) TMI 419 - AT
  55. 2012 (10) TMI 911 - AT
  56. 2011 (12) TMI 262 - AT
  57. 2013 (12) TMI 377 - AT
  58. 2011 (11) TMI 229 - AT
  59. 2011 (9) TMI 494 - AT
  60. 2011 (9) TMI 352 - AT
  61. 2011 (8) TMI 778 - AT
  62. 2011 (4) TMI 1153 - AT
  63. 2011 (3) TMI 528 - AT
  64. 2011 (2) TMI 121 - AT
  65. 2011 (1) TMI 678 - AT
  66. 2010 (7) TMI 118 - AT
  67. 2010 (6) TMI 254 - AT
  68. 2010 (1) TMI 238 - AT
  69. 2009 (7) TMI 518 - AT
  70. 2009 (5) TMI 54 - AT
  71. 2009 (1) TMI 44 - AT
  72. 2008 (10) TMI 82 - AT
  73. 2008 (8) TMI 49 - AT
  74. 2008 (8) TMI 191 - AT
  75. 2008 (7) TMI 47 - AT
  76. 2007 (10) TMI 12 - AT
  77. 2007 (9) TMI 50 - AT
  78. 2007 (7) TMI 82 - AT
  79. 2007 (6) TMI 6 - AT
  80. 2007 (4) TMI 95 - AT
  81. 2007 (2) TMI 85 - AT
  82. 2006 (12) TMI 12 - AT
  83. 2006 (10) TMI 61 - AT
  84. 2006 (9) TMI 14 - AT
Issues Involved:
1. Whether assessees were clearing and forwarding agents under their respective agreements.
2. Liability to pay service tax for services connected with forwarding and clearing operations.
3. Interpretation of "clearing and forwarding agent" under Section 65(25) of the Finance Act, 1994.
4. Applicability of the decision in Prabhat Zarda Factory (Pvt.) Ltd. vs. CCE, Patna.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Clearing and Forwarding Agents under Agreements:
The primary issue was whether the assessees, under their agreements, were considered clearing and forwarding agents and thus liable for service tax. The Tribunal examined the nature of services provided by the assessees, focusing on whether procuring/booking orders for the principal on a commission basis constituted services as clearing and forwarding agents.

2. Liability to Pay Service Tax:
The Tribunal reviewed the liability to pay service tax for services connected with forwarding and clearing operations. The assessees argued that procuring orders was a distinct service from clearing and forwarding operations. They contended that the taxable service provided by a clearing and forwarding agent should be directly related to clearing and forwarding operations, as specified under clause (j) of sub-section (105) of Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994.

3. Interpretation of "Clearing and Forwarding Agent":
The Tribunal scrutinized the definition of "clearing and forwarding agent" under Section 65(25) of the Finance Act, 1994, which reads: "Clearing and Forwarding Agent means any person who is engaged in providing any service, either directly or indirectly, connected with the clearing and forwarding operations in any manner to any other person and includes a consignment agent." The Tribunal highlighted that the service must be connected with clearing and forwarding operations, involving activities that have a bearing on the movement of goods.

4. Applicability of Prabhat Zarda Factory Decision:
The Tribunal examined the applicability of the decision in Prabhat Zarda Factory (Pvt.) Ltd. vs. CCE, Patna, which held that procuring orders by an agent amounted to services connected with clearing and forwarding operations. The Tribunal noted that the definition of "clearing and forwarding agent" should not be isolated from the activity of clearing and forwarding operations. It emphasized that a person providing service of procuring orders without engaging in clearing and forwarding operations does not fall within the definition of a clearing and forwarding agent.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that mere procuring or booking orders for the principal by an agent on a commission basis does not amount to providing services as a "clearing and forwarding agent" within the meaning of Section 65(25) of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision in Prabhat Zarda Factory (Pvt.) Ltd. was overruled to the extent of this interpretation. The appeals were to be placed before the concerned Divisional Bench for decision on merits in light of this judgment.

Pronouncement:
The judgment was pronounced in open court on 22.06.2006.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates