Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + SC Customs - 2006 (8) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (8) TMI 179 - SC - Customs


Issues Involved:
1. Unauthorized loading, unloading, storage, or removal of imported, indigenous items, and scrap.
2. Invocation of the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 28 of the Customs Act.
3. Confiscation of goods and levy of customs duty and penalty.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Unauthorized Loading, Unloading, Storage, or Removal of Imported, Indigenous Items, and Scrap:
The appellants, engaged in offshore oil exploration and exploitation under contracts with ONGC, were issued show cause notices by the Customs Department alleging unauthorized activities at Nhava Base. The notices contended unauthorized loading, unloading, storage, or removal of items and proposed to recover escaped customs duty and levy penalties. The appellants argued that the Customs Department was aware of these activities, as ONGC had informed the department about its operations, and hence, the demand for duty and penalties was unjustified.

2. Invocation of the Extended Period of Limitation under Proviso to Section 28 of the Customs Act:
The primary contention was whether the Department could invoke the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 28 of the Customs Act. The appellants argued that the show cause notices lacked specific allegations of collusion, willful mis-statement, or willful suppression of facts necessary to invoke the extended period. The court noted that the proviso to Section 28 requires an intention to evade duty, and the show cause notices did not contain necessary averments pointing out specific omissions or commissions by the appellants. Consequently, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked.

3. Confiscation of Goods and Levy of Customs Duty and Penalty:
The Tribunal accepted the appeals of Essar Oil Limited and Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Limited, setting aside the confiscation of goods and the levy of duty and penalties. It was noted that ONGC had informed the Customs Department of its operations at Nhava Base, and the department was aware of the general nature of activities. The Tribunal concluded that the appellants, acting on behalf of ONGC, could not be accused of willful suppression of facts. The court held that the Department was not justified in invoking the extended period of limitation, and the demand for duty and penalties for the subsequent period was quashed.

Conclusion:
The appeals were partly accepted. The appellants were liable to pay duty for six months immediately preceding the issuance of the show cause notice but not for the subsequent period, as the demand for the subsequent period was beyond the period of limitation. Penalties for the six-month period were waived, and the point on merits was left open. Each party was to bear its own costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates