9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2001 (1) TMI 107 - CGOVT - Central Excise
Issues involved:
The issues involved in this judgment include rejection of rebate claims on grounds of time-barred filing and non-observance of prescribed procedures, competence of Commissioner (Appeals) to condone procedural lapses, and interpretation of legal provisions related to condonation of lapses. Rejection of Rebate Claims: The Asstt. Commissioner rejected rebate claims totaling Rs. 90,65,622.66 for exports of goods under bond due to time-barred filing and non-observance of procedures under Notification No. 42/94 u/r 12(1)(b) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter back to the original authority for re-examination and specific directions. Competence of Commissioner (Appeals): The applicants argued that the Commissioner (Appeals) could have condoned the delay under the proviso to Rule 12, citing the G.T.C. Exports Ltd. case. They contended that the Commissioner (Appeals) had the power to condone procedural lapses and should not have remanded the case. The Government observed that the Commissioner (Appeals) could not condone lapses due to limitations specified in Section 12E of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Interpretation of Legal Provisions: The legal position regarding the powers of the Commissioner (Appeals) to condone procedural lapses was discussed in light of previous decisions. The Government rectified an earlier interpretational error and clarified the restrictions on the powers of the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 12E. The Government also considered the substantive nature of the conditions not fulfilled and the need for condonation of procedural lapses to encourage exports. Conclusion: The Government decided to grant condonation of the procedural lapses related to specific conditions of Notification No. 42/94 and allowed the Revision Applications subject to verification of relevant documents. The judgment emphasized the importance of encouraging exports and rectifying interpretational errors in legal provisions.
|
