2003 (2) TMI 102 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues Involved: Whether affixing a sticker on imported goods amounts to manufacture under Note 3 to Chapter 18 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act.

Comprehensive Details:

Issue 1: Affixing Sticker on Imported Goods
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, addressed the issue raised by M/s. Lal International Pvt. Ltd. regarding the classification of affixing stickers on imported chocolates as a manufacturing activity. The Appellants imported chocolates with a foreign brand name already affixed and subsequently added stickers containing statutory information. The Tribunal considered the Revenue's contention that this activity constituted manufacturing, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents.

Issue 2: Legal Precedents and Interpretation
Shri R. Krishnan, representing the Appellants, argued that affixing stickers did not amount to manufacturing, referencing the Standards of Weights and Measures Rules and previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal noted the decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi v. Panchsheel Soap Factory, where a similar issue was addressed. The Tribunal also highlighted the decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi-I v. Manisha International Pvt. Ltd., which supported the Appellants' position.

Issue 3: Tribunal's Decision
In light of previous rulings, including the cases of Panchsheel Soap Factory and Manisha International Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal concluded that affixing stickers on imported goods did not constitute manufacturing. The Tribunal emphasized that the products were marketable even before the stickers were added, and noted the similarity between Note 6 to Chapters 34 and Note 3 to Chapter 18 and 19. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal based on these findings.

Issue 4: Applicability of Previous Decisions
The Tribunal distinguished the facts of the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Madras v. A.P. Basava Prabhu, as not directly relevant to the current appeal. Based on the consistent interpretation of relevant legal notes and precedents, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the Appellants' appeal.

This summary provides a detailed overview of the legal judgment, addressing the issues involved and the Tribunal's reasoning based on legal provisions and precedents.