Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2004 (4) TMI 227 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Interpretation of Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 regarding reversal of amount based on the value of final goods or specific components used in manufacturing.

Analysis:
The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai dealt with multiple appeals concerning the manufacture of diesel engines and their use in the production of "Couple sets." The appellants cleared diesel engines by paying duty and also used them captively for manufacturing exempted couple sets. The dispute revolved around the application of Rule 57CC, which required a reversal of 8% of the value of final goods cleared without payment of duty. The question at hand was whether this reversal should be based on the value of the entire couple set or only the diesel engine portion.

Upon reviewing the facts, the Tribunal noted a gap in the information provided in the order-in-original, leading to confusion regarding the exemption status of diesel engines used in couple sets. The Tribunal referenced a previous case where a similar order requiring the reversal of 8% of the value of couple sets was confirmed. However, the appellants argued that diesel engines were not exempt from duty payment, implying that duty should be paid on them when used in manufacturing couple sets.

After careful examination, the Tribunal concluded that there was no exemption for diesel engines used in the production of couple sets, necessitating the payment of duty on such engines. As a result, the application of Rule 57CC for the reversal of 8% based on the diesel engine value alone was deemed appropriate, and the requirement to recover the differential value did not arise.

In light of the above discussion, the Tribunal allowed all the appeals, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities and providing consequential relief as per the law. The judgment clarified the application of Rule 57CC in cases involving the manufacture of exempted goods using components subject to duty, emphasizing the need to pay duty on specific components even if the final product is exempted.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates