2005 (9) TMI 142 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
- Interpretation of Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. regarding SSI exemption eligibility based on previous year's clearances.
- Whether the value of clearances in the preceding year should be considered for availing the exemption in the subsequent year.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against OIA No. 237/2004-C.E., challenging the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals)-II, Hyderabad's decision. The appellants, manufacturers of edible refined oils, availed SSI Exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E. for the first clearance of Rs. 100 lakhs without including the turnover of exempted goods in the aggregate value of clearances. The Revenue contended that the appellants, who cleared refined oil worth Rs. 7,70,50,933/- in the previous year, were not eligible for the exemption in the subsequent year. The adjudicating authority demanded payment under Section 11A of the C.E. Act, 1944, along with interest and a penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision, leading to the appeal before the Tribunal.

The key arguments presented were based on the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in a similar case and the introduction of Chapter note 4 to Chapter 15 in 2003-2004. The learned Advocate for the appellants contended that since there was no manufacture of excisable goods during 2002-03, the turnover of refined oil exceeding Rs. 7 crores should not impact the eligibility for SSI benefit in 2003-04. Additionally, it was argued that the value of clearances in the previous year should not be considered due to the absence of excisable goods in 2002-03.

Upon careful examination of the case records, the Tribunal focused on whether the value of clearances in 2002-03 should influence the SSI exemption eligibility under Notification No. 8/2003 for 2003-04. Condition (vii) of the notification specified that the aggregate value of clearances of excisable goods should not exceed Rs. 300 lakhs in the current financial year. The Tribunal determined that the refined edible oils cleared in 2002-03, despite attracting nil duty rate, were excisable goods. As the value of these clearances exceeded Rs. 7 lakhs, the appellants were deemed ineligible for the exemption in 2003-04. The Tribunal emphasized that the Supreme Court decision and the introduction of Chapter Note 4 to Chapter 15 were not pertinent to the issue at hand, leading to the rejection of the appeals.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals, emphasizing that the value of clearances in the preceding year should indeed be considered for determining SSI exemption eligibility under Notification No. 8/2003-C.E.