9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Appeal against orders of Commissioner (Appeals) confirming additional income-tax levy under section 104 for assessment years 1978-79 and 1979-80. - Dispute over the rate of additional tax (37% to 25%). - Additional ground of appeal raised by assessee regarding jurisdiction under section 2(18)(b)(B). - Admissibility of the additional ground raised at a late stage of proceedings. Analysis: The judgment pertains to cross-appeals against the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) confirming the levy of additional income tax under section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 1978-79 and 1979-80. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) had imposed the additional tax due to the assessee's failure to declare dividends within the prescribed period following the previous years. The Commissioner (Appeals) initially upheld the ITO's decision, but later reduced the tax rate from 37% to 25% upon a rectification application by the assessee, leading to appeals by both parties to the Tribunal. During the appeal hearing, the assessee raised an additional ground challenging the jurisdiction of the ITO under section 104, claiming to be a company substantially interested by the public under section 2(18)(b)(B). The assessee argued that this ground, though not raised earlier, was crucial and should be admitted as it affects the ITO's authority to levy additional tax. The departmental representative opposed the admission, citing finality of previous assessments and the need for fresh investigation into the new claim. The Tribunal, after considering both sides' arguments, allowed the additional ground raised by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that the objection went to the root of the matter, impacting the ITO's initial jurisdiction under section 104. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal concluded that the additional ground was admissible as it pertained to the subject matter of appeal and could potentially affect the outcome significantly. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities' orders and remanded the matter to the ITO for fresh consideration in light of the additional ground raised by the assessee. The Tribunal also noted a previous order dismissing the revenue's appeal against the tax rate reduction, indicating that the rate issue should be addressed after resolving the jurisdictional challenge. Consequently, all four appeals were treated as allowed for statistical purposes. In conclusion, the judgment highlights the importance of allowing crucial legal issues to be raised even at a late stage if they impact the jurisdiction of the tax authorities, ensuring a fair and comprehensive examination of all relevant aspects in tax matters.
|
