9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interim dividend treatment in Balance Sheet for deduction under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Detailed Analysis: The appeal pertains to an assessment year where the assessee-company declared an interim dividend in a resolution dated 3-10-1979, payable on or after 11-10-1979. The dispute arose regarding the treatment of this interim dividend amount of Rs. 3,75,000 in the Balance Sheet as on 30th June, 1979, for the purpose of deduction under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The company argued that since the liability to declare dividend arose only upon the resolution of the Board of Directors, which occurred after 1-7-1979, it should not be considered a liability for the purpose of computing capital as on 1-7-1979. The company relied on legal precedents to support its position, emphasizing the distinction between interim and final dividends and the timing of approval by the General Body Meeting. On the other hand, the departmental representative cited a Supreme Court ruling stating that appropriations made after the accounting period but approved by the General Body Meeting relate back to the relevant year. Therefore, the department argued that the approval of the provision for interim dividend in the Balance Sheet of 30th June 1979 by the General Body Meeting in December 1979 should be considered for computing the capital as on 1-7-1979. The departmental representative contended that the approval related back to the relevant year, justifying the inclusion of the interim dividend provision in the capital computation. After considering the arguments, the Tribunal noted that the Balance Sheet as on 30th June, 1979 was approved by the annual general meeting in December 1979. Citing the Supreme Court precedent, the Tribunal held that appropriations approved by the shareholders relate back to the relevant year. Consequently, the Tribunal found no justification to exclude the provision for interim dividend from the capital computation as on 1-7-1979. Therefore, the orders of the revenue authorities were upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. The other grounds raised in the appeal were not pursued during the hearing.
|
