Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1991 (9) TMI AT This
Issues:
- Whether interest under s. 215 was chargeable in each case without specific direction in the assessment orders or orders made under s. 154 of the Act. Analysis: The appeals involved a common issue regarding the charging of interest under s. 215 without specific directions in the assessment orders or orders made under s. 154 of the Act. The factual background revealed that initial assessments under s. 143(1) were made, determining the total income provisionally. Subsequently, orders under s. 154 were issued without specific directions for charging interest under s. 215. It was undisputed that no interest under s. 215 was directed or charged in the initial assessments under s. 143(1). However, interest under s. 215 was charged after the orders under s. 154 were implemented, leading to appeals by the assessees before the Dy. CIT(A) challenging the interest charged. The Dy. CIT(A) upheld the charging of interest, citing conformity with the provisions of s. 215(3) of the Act, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals. Upon careful consideration of the submissions and relevant legal provisions, the Tribunal delved into the interpretation of s. 215. Sub-section (1) of s. 215 outlined the conditions for charging interest when advance tax paid falls short of the assessed tax. Sub-section (3), amended in 1984, mandated adjustments to interest based on orders under s. 147 or s. 154. The Tribunal referenced a Karnataka High Court judgment defining "regular assessment" and emphasizing that orders under s. 215 were not part of the assessment order. They also considered a Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment regarding interest calculation based on the final income determined. Further, a Bombay High Court Full Bench decision highlighted the obligation to refund excess interest under sub-s. (3) of s. 215. The Tribunal concluded that interest under s. 215 must be explicitly directed in the regular assessment order and charged on the total income, as per the legal interpretations. Since no direction for interest under s. 215 was present in the orders under s. 154, the Tribunal deemed the interest charged unjustified and consequently deleted the interest in each case. In light of the legal analysis and precedents cited, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessees and deleting the interest charged under s. 215 in each case.
|