9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Appeal against consolidated order, non-admittance of appeal by CWT(A), valuation of compensation, assessment of interest amount, allowance of income-tax and wealth-tax liability, compliance with payment of admitted tax before filing appeals. Analysis: The bunch of appeals filed by the assessee challenged the consolidated order of CWT(A) for the assessment years 1982-83 to 1988-89. The issues raised in all appeals were identical, leading to a consolidated disposal for convenience. The grounds included the non-admittance of the appeal, valuation of compensation, assessment of interest amount, and the allowance of income-tax and wealth-tax liability. The CWT(A) dismissed the appeals in limine, citing the mandatory requirement for the assessee to pay admitted tax before filing wealth returns to be eligible to appeal against assessment orders. The CWT(A) relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and observed that despite the attachment of the bank account, the admitted tax remained unpaid. The assessee contended that the entire demand was paid before the appeals were heard, citing precedents where payment before the appeal hearing was considered sufficient compliance. The Tribunal considered the facts and evidence, noting discrepancies in the CWT(A)'s findings regarding the attachment and withdrawal of amounts from the bank account. Referring to similar cases, the Tribunal set aside the CWT(A)'s order and restored the issue for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for the assessee to be heard before dismissal. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of compliance with payment requirements and the obligation to allow a fair hearing before dismissing appeals. Given the circumstances and legal precedents, the Tribunal set aside the CWT(A)'s order and directed a fresh consideration of the issue regarding the payment of admitted tax. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a thorough examination of the facts, particularly regarding the withdrawal of amounts during the period of account attachment, before reaching a decision. The assessee was to be given a fair opportunity to present their case before a new decision was made. As the CWT(A)'s order was set aside for fresh consideration, the Tribunal did not provide detailed findings on the merits of the case. The appeals were treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes, pending the outcome of the reassessment by the CWT(A. In conclusion, the Tribunal's decision focused on the procedural aspects of compliance with payment requirements and the necessity of a fair hearing before dismissing appeals. The case was remanded for a fresh determination, emphasizing the importance of thorough examination and adherence to legal precedents in reaching a decision.
|
