1998 (6) TMI 112 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Disputed figures adopted by AO
2. Applicability of provisions of s. 158BC
3. Transfer of assessment files by CIT
4. Valuation of residential building
5. Estimation of domestic and personal expenses
6. Loan from LIC and repayment
7. Undisclosed income determination

Analysis:

1. The appeal involved the assessee disputing the figures adopted by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding various transactions, including LIC loan, repayment, construction costs, domestic expenses, alleged deposits, and undisclosed income computation under s. 158BC of the IT Act, 1961.

2. The key issue was the applicability of provisions of s. 158BC, with the assessee arguing against its application due to no search conducted on their premises. However, the Departmental Representative contended that s. 158BD applied as a search was conducted, making the provisions of s. 158BC applicable.

3. Another issue was the transfer of assessment files by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) to the AO for making an assessment for the block period cases. The assessee challenged the transfer, arguing it was not an assessment from year to year but for a unit of block period.

4. The valuation of the residential building was disputed, with the assessee objecting to the valuation determined by the Departmental valuation officer. The AO accepted the valuation made by the valuation cell based on CPWD rates, despite objections raised by the assessee regarding the cost of construction.

5. The estimation of domestic and personal expenses was also contested, with the AO reworking the expenses based on family size and social status. The Tribunal found the AO's estimates for certain assessment years to be just and reasonable but reduced the estimates for other years.

6. Disputes also arose regarding the loan from LIC, repayment, marriage expenses, and fixed deposits, leading to a partial relief granted to the assessee based on the facts and evidence on record.

7. Finally, the determination of undisclosed income for the block period was a crucial aspect. The Tribunal directed adjustments and granted relief, ultimately settling on an undisclosed income figure of Rs. 2,00,000 for the block period after considering various disputed items and transactions.

Overall, the Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, providing relief to the assessee on certain issues while upholding the assessment made under s. 143(3) r/w s. 158BC of the IT Act.