9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Disallowance of deduction under section 80HHC(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1984-85 based on comparison of export turnover with the immediately preceding year. Analysis: 1. The assessee exported merchandise and claimed deduction under section 80HHC(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, which was allowed. However, the assessee further claimed deduction under section 80HHC(1)(b) on the export turnover exceeding the turnover of the immediately preceding year. This claim was denied by the DC (Appeals) on the grounds that the previous year's turnover was minimal, only Rs. 200, compared to Rs. 3,04,348 in the current year. The DC (Appeals) deemed it inappropriate to compare such minimal turnover with the current year's turnover for allowing the deduction under section 80HHC. The assessee, dissatisfied with the decision, appealed to the Appellate Tribunal. 2. The representative of the assessee argued that the purpose of section 80HHC is to encourage and boost export turnover annually. He highlighted that there is no stipulation requiring the previous year's turnover to be comparable for the entire year. The assessee relied on a decision by the ITAT, Delhi Bench to support their case. On the other hand, the departmental representative supported the decision of the CIT(A) disallowing the deduction. 3. The crux of the issue lies in the interpretation of section 80HHC(1)(b) which allows a deduction based on the increase in export turnover from the immediately preceding year. The definition of "export turnover" includes sale proceeds in convertible foreign exchange from goods exported out of India. The Tribunal emphasized that there is no explicit requirement in the provision for the business to be carried out for the entire previous year. The primary objective is to promote exports and enhance foreign exchange earnings. By imposing conditions beyond the clear language of the provision, the authorities erred in denying the tax benefit. The Tribunal held that the assessee met all the conditions under clause (b) and is entitled to the benefit of incremental turnover, directing the Assessing Officer to compute and allow the deduction. 4. Ultimately, the Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, emphasizing that the provision should be liberally construed to align with its intended purpose of encouraging better export performance annually. The decision underscores the importance of interpreting tax provisions in a manner that promotes the legislative intent and objectives, rather than imposing subjective conditions that hinder legitimate claims for deductions.
|
