Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2009 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (9) TMI 81 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Charitable status of the appellant society.
2. Criteria for approval under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the IT Act, 1961.
3. Compliance with the conditions laid down in Section 80G(5) and Rule 11AA.
4. The genuineness of the activities of the appellant society.
5. Proper filing of Form 10G.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Charitable Status of the Appellant Society:
The appellant society was established with the objective of spreading education without any distinction of caste and creed. It was initially registered on 17th March 1923 and again on 29th September 1980 under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The society operates five educational institutions. It was granted registration under Section 12AA of the IT Act on 23rd February 2006, effective from 1st April 2005. The Tribunal later directed the CIT to condone the delay in filing the application and re-decide the application under Section 12AA/12A, leading to the registration being effective from 29th September 1980. The income of the society was held to be exempt under Section 143(3) for assessment years 2004-05 to 2006-07.

2. Criteria for Approval under Section 80G(5)(vi):
The CIT rejected the application for approval under Section 80G(5)(vi) on several grounds, including:
- The society does not fulfill the criteria of providing aid to needy people who cannot pay for the services.
- Charging fees limits benefits to a select class, not the public at large.
- The society is making systematic profits, which contradicts the charitable purpose.
- The provisions of Sections 11 and 12 do not envisage a charitable institution charging fees.
- No separate books of accounts for business and donations are maintained.
- The memorandum and articles of association do not eliminate profit-making as a dominant purpose.
- Diversion of general funds to the corpus without donation under Section 11(1)(d).
- Expenditure akin to a private concern carrying on a profitable business.
- The society's activities are not genuine and not for charitable purposes.

3. Compliance with Conditions in Section 80G(5) and Rule 11AA:
The appellant argued that the CIT had already granted registration under Section 12AA, which is sufficient proof of the charitable purpose. The Punjab & Haryana High Court in Sonepat Hindu Educational & Charitable Society vs. CIT held that registration under Section 12AA is proof of charitable purposes. The appellant satisfied the conditions laid down in Section 80G(5) and Rule 11AA, including maintaining regular accounts and being registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.

4. Genuineness of Activities:
The appellant contended that the CIT's observations on the genuineness of activities were misconceived. The CIT's reliance on the minutes of the proceedings to question the genuineness was beyond the scope of inquiry under Section 80G. The appellant's activities were genuinely for educational purposes, and the surplus generated was applied for charitable purposes. The charging of fees does not negate the charitable status, as supported by judicial pronouncements.

5. Proper Filing of Form 10G:
The CIT's observation that Form 10G was not properly filled was challenged by the appellant. The appellant argued that no notice was issued regarding the improper filling, and the form was filled correctly to the best of their knowledge. The CIT's technical objections were considered misplaced.

Judgment:
The Tribunal concluded that the appellant society fulfilled all the conditions laid down in Rule 11AA and Section 80G(5). The society's registration under Section 12AA and the exemption granted under Sections 11 and 12 for previous assessment years supported its charitable status. The Tribunal directed the CIT to grant registration under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the IT Act, 1961. The appeal was allowed, and the case law relied upon by the CIT was found to be distinguishable on facts.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates