9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Challenge to first appellate order regarding interest under sections 139(8) and 217. 2. Disallowance of notification charges. 3. Appeal against interest under section 139(8) of the IT Act, 1961. 4. Appeal against interest under section 214 of the IT Act, 1961. Analysis: 1. The appellant challenged the first appellate order concerning the demand for interest under sections 139(8) and 217 of the IT Act. The appellant argued that there was no specific order or direction in the assessment order regarding the interest demanded. Additionally, the appellant contended that the interest charged under section 217 was improper and illegal due to the advance-tax payment made. The appellant also highlighted the excess advance-tax payment and asserted that there was no loss of revenue, thus deeming the interest demand unjustified. Ultimately, the appellant denied liability to pay interest under sections 139(8) and 217. 2. The issue of disallowance of Rs. 40 related to notification charges concerning a change in the firm's constitution was dismissed as not pressed by the appellant. 3. Regarding the appeal against interest under section 139(8) of the IT Act, 1961, it was observed that the assessment order did not mention charging interest under this section. The demand for interest seemed to have been conveyed through a demand notice without a specific order in the assessment. Citing relevant case laws and precedents, the tribunal concluded that no interest under section 139(8) was chargeable as there was no order by the Income Tax Officer in the original assessment. The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appellant's appeal on this point. 4. The appeal against interest under section 214 of the IT Act, 1961, was rejected as it was deemed not arising from the impugned order. The tribunal partly allowed the appellant's appeal in light of the above analysis.
|
