9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) under section 248 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Dispute regarding the rate of tax deduction under sections 115A and 195 of the Act. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: The appeal was filed by the assessee-company against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) under section 248 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner (Appeals) had refused to admit the appeal, stating that the dispute did not fall under section 248 as the company admitted its liability for tax deduction but contested the amount based on a dispute under section 115A, not section 195. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal for non-admission on that ground. Issue 2: The dispute revolved around the rate of tax deduction under sections 115A and 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee-company entered into an agreement with a German company for technical know-how, and the tax liability of the German company was to be borne by the assessee-company. The ITO instructed the assessee to deduct tax at 40%, while the assessee believed it should be 20%. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that since the tax was paid at 40%, the appeal did not fall under section 248. However, the appellate tribunal noted that the crucial requirement under section 248 is that the tax must be deducted and paid in accordance with sections 195 and 200, and the appellant must deny liability to make such deduction. In this case, the assessee had paid tax at 40%, satisfying the conditions of section 248, making the appeal maintainable. The tribunal directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to admit the appeal and decide whether the rate of tax deduction should be 20% or 40%. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee-company.
|
