Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1979 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1979 (6) TMI 80 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
Determining whether unclaimed wages and unclaimed bonus are taxable under section 41(1) of the IT Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1972-73.

Analysis:
The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur involved the question of whether unclaimed wages and unclaimed bonus totaling Rs. 16,336 and Rs. 58,091 respectively were taxable under section 41(1) of the IT Act, 1961 for the relevant assessment year. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) and the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (AAC) had opined that the claims became time-barred and had merged into the company's profits, becoming part of the shareholders' profit.

The assessee contended that there was no remission or cessation of liability by the debtor's unilateral act, as the company was obligated to pay the labor under labor laws despite any limitations. The assessee relied on various case laws to support this argument, challenging the findings of the AAC.

After considering the arguments and evidence presented, the Member of the Tribunal found that there was no cessation of liability or remission under section 41 of the IT Act, 1961. The Tribunal highlighted that under the law, a debt or liability persists even if its recovery is time-barred. The Member referred to legal precedents to support the position that the mere transfer of an entry by the debtor does not constitute a cessation or remission of liability.

Ultimately, the Tribunal held that the findings of the AAC were incorrect, as there was no cessation of liability regarding the unclaimed amounts in question. Therefore, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions made to the income for the relevant year. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates