9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Trading addition of Rs. 8,000 2. Disallowance of Rs. 2,000 out of shop expenses 3. Disallowance of Rs. 10,000 out of messing expenses 4. Disallowance of car and scooter expenses 5. Addition due to unreconciled differences between books and bank 6. Rate of depreciation allowable to the generator 7. Levying of interest under ss. 215, 139(8) and deduction under s. 80G Trading Addition of Rs. 8,000: The appellant contested a trading addition of Rs. 8,000, arguing that the gross profit rate was comparable to the previous year. The Department claimed the addition due to the absence of a stock register. The tribunal noted the adequacy of the gross profit rate compared to the previous year and deleted the trading addition, finding it unnecessary. Disallowance of Shop Expenses: A disallowance of Rs. 2,000 out of shop expenses was contested by the appellant as baseless. The Department argued that certain expenses were inadmissible. The tribunal upheld the disallowance, noting expenses related to Diwali and marriages were not business-related and rightly disallowed. Disallowance of Messing Expenses: A disallowance of Rs. 10,000 out of messing expenses was disputed by the appellant, stating it was for employees staying on factory premises. The Department deemed it excessive. The tribunal found the disallowance unjustified, as the expenses were solely for employees and not partners, thus deleting the disallowance. Disallowance of Car and Scooter Expenses: The appellant argued against the disallowance of car and scooter expenses, contending they were not personal expenses. The tribunal held that expenses must be for business purposes to be allowed, and personal usage by partners did not qualify. Therefore, the disallowance was upheld. Unreconciled Differences in Accounts: An addition due to unreconciled differences between the books and financial institutions was contested by the appellant, citing unavailability of statements. The tribunal ruled that no income could arise from non-reconciliation, thus deleting the addition. Rate of Depreciation for Generator: The appellant claimed a higher depreciation rate of 30% for a generator instead of 10%. Referring to a previous case, the tribunal agreed that a generator fell under a specific category allowing 30% depreciation, thereby granting the higher rate. Levying of Interest and Deductions: The appellant raised issues regarding interest levies and deductions, seeking a reevaluation by the assessing officer. The tribunal directed the officer to reconsider these claims, allowing the appellant a full opportunity to substantiate them. In conclusion, the tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on certain issues like trading addition deletion, messing expenses disallowance, generator depreciation rate, and directing a reevaluation of interest levies and deductions.
|
