9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment involves appeals filed by the Department and the assessee regarding trading addition representing excessive wastage claimed by the assessee for assessment years 1984-85, 1985-86, and 1986-87. Issue 1 - Trading Addition for Excessive Wastage: The Department made additions for excessive wastage claimed by the assessee in the production of yarn and cloth. The AO found higher process loss in the current year compared to the previous year, leading to additions of Rs. 21,57,800 and Rs. 3,20,000 for assessment years 1984-85 and 1985-86, respectively. The CIT(A) deleted these additions based on the assessee's maintenance of regular books of accounts and strict vigilance by the excise department, with no defects pointed out by the AO. Legal precedents were cited to support the claim, and the CIT(A) concluded that the accounts were correct and complete, hence rejecting the trading additions. Issue 2 - Carry Forward of Loss: In the appeal for assessment year 1986-87, the first ground related to the rejection of the assessee's claim for carrying forward losses due to a late-filed return. The AO disallowed the claim as the return was filed after the due date. The CIT(A) upheld this decision, stating that the return was belated and not filed within the time available under the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal found merit in the assessee's argument that the return was filed within the extended period granted after a request on Form No. VI. Citing legal precedent, the Tribunal allowed the claim for carry forward of losses, emphasizing that the return was filed within the extended period and should be treated as filed on time. The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeals and partially allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the AO to allow the claim for carrying forward losses to the succeeding year.
|
