1983 (12) TMI 130 - AT - Income Tax

Accumulated Profits, Backward Area, Industrial Undertaking, Interest Income, Interest On Fixed Deposits, Profits And Gains

Issues Involved:
1. Determination of the quantum of deduction allowable under section 80HH of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Whether the interest earned on fixed deposits should be considered as income derived from the industrial undertaking for the purpose of section 80HH.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Determination of the Quantum of Deduction Allowable under Section 80HH of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
The primary issue revolves around the determination of the quantum of deduction allowable to the assessee under section 80HH. The assessee, a public limited company engaged in the manufacture and sale of liquor, claimed that the deduction under section 80HH should also be allowed in respect of the income derived by way of interest on fixed deposits. The departmental authorities and the Commissioner (Appeals) disallowed this claim, distinguishing the cases relied upon by the assessee and citing the Kerala High Court decision in Collis Line (P.) Ltd. v. ITO [1982] 135 ITR 390.

2. Interest Earned on Fixed Deposits as Income Derived from the Industrial Undertaking:
The assessee argued that the fixed deposits were intended for future expansion projects and hence, the interest earned should be considered as income derived from the industrial undertaking. The assessee presented various Board resolutions to support this claim, highlighting projects such as the disposal of distillery effluent, manufacture of sodium bichromate, construction of staff quarters, and adoption of French technology for cattle feed production. The learned departmental representative contended that the resolutions were passed long after the relevant accounting years and that the interest on fixed deposits could not be equated to profits and gains from the industrial undertaking as envisaged by section 80HH.

Tribunal's Findings:

1. Accumulation of Profits and Investment in Fixed Deposits:
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had substantial amounts in fixed deposits, which came from accumulated profits and reserves. The assessee had not distributed any dividends and had kept the profits for future expansion projects. The Tribunal found that the conduct of the assessee in keeping the accumulated profits in fixed deposits was consistent with its claim of future expansion.

2. Relevance of Board Resolutions:
The Tribunal acknowledged the Board resolutions indicating the intention to use the accumulated funds for future projects. Although these resolutions were passed after the relevant accounting years, they supported the assessee's claim to some extent for the assessment year 1979-80 and future years.

3. Nature of Interest Income:
The Tribunal considered the decisions of the Calcutta High Court in Phillips Carbon Block Ltd. v. CIT [1982] 136 ITR 205 and the Bombay High Court in CIT v. Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. [1982] 137 ITR 42, which supported the assessee's stand that the amounts held in fixed deposits constituted part of its capital employed in the industrial undertaking. The Tribunal held that the interest earned on these deposits should be regarded as income derived from the business undertaking of the assessee.

4. Section 80HH Provisions:
The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of section 80HH, which allows a deduction of 20% of the profits and gains derived from an industrial undertaking. The Tribunal distinguished between the expressions 'derived from' and 'attributable to', noting that section 80HH uses the former. The Tribunal concluded that the income generated by way of interest on deposits of money held as part of the industrial undertaking is an ingredient of the profits and gains derived from such undertaking.

5. Conclusion:
The Tribunal upheld the assessee's claim, directing the deduction under section 80HH on the amount derived by way of fixed deposits. The Tribunal emphasized that even if the interest income could not be strictly referable to the business of manufacturing liquor, it could still be regarded as profit or gain derived from the undertaking as a whole.

Judgment:
In the result, the appeals were allowed, and the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80HH on the interest earned from fixed deposits was upheld.

← Previous Next →