9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Guest House Expenses 2. Disallowance of Presentation Articles Expenditure 3. Addition of Excess Realization on Sale of Levy Sugar and Interest Thereon Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Guest House Expenses: The first issue concerns the addition of Rs. 3,07,072 made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of expenditure on food and beverages, treating it as expenditure on maintenance of a guest house. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] confirmed this addition. However, this ground is covered in favor of the assessee by the decision of the ITAT Pune in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 1996-97. Following this precedent, the Tribunal allowed this ground in favor of the assessee. 2. Disallowance of Presentation Articles Expenditure: The second issue pertains to the disallowance of Rs. 46,825 made under Rule 6B, which the CIT(A) held as expenditure in the nature of advertisement. The Tribunal found that this ground is covered in favor of the assessee by the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. Allana Sons (P.) Ltd. [1995] 216 ITR 690. Respectfully following this precedent, the Tribunal allowed this ground in favor of the assessee. 3. Addition of Excess Realization on Sale of Levy Sugar and Interest Thereon: The third issue involves the addition of Rs. 3,61,78,204 on account of excess realization on the sale of levy sugar and interest thereon relating to earlier years. The assessee had collected excess levy sugar price as per an interim order of the Karnataka High Court for the sugar seasons 1974-75 to 1978-79. This amount, along with the interest payable thereon, was shown as a liability in the balance sheet. The Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the Supreme Court settled the matter on 22-9-1993, and the Government of India issued notifications on 22-2-1995, re-fixing the price for the levy of sugar. Consequently, the AO added Rs. 3,61,78,204 as income for the assessment year 1995-96, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The Tribunal examined the legal position regarding the accrual of income, emphasizing that under the mercantile system of accounting, taxability depends on the date when the amount becomes due, not its receipt. The Tribunal referred to various legal precedents, including CIT v. Shri Goverdhan Ltd. [1968] 69 ITR 675 (SC) and Morvi Industries Ltd. v. CIT [1971] 82 ITR 835, to substantiate that income accrues when the right to receive it becomes vested in the assessee. In this case, the Tribunal concluded that the excess levy sugar price, finally determined by the notifications issued on 22-2-1995 in compliance with the Supreme Court judgment, accrued as income during the accounting year ending 31-3-1995 and was taxable in the assessment year 1995-96. The Tribunal rejected the assessee's argument that the right to the excess levy sugar price was inchoate and concluded that there was a cessation of liability due to the notification, making the impugned sums taxable in the assessment year 1995-96. Therefore, the Tribunal rejected this ground. Conclusion: The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed, with the Tribunal granting relief on the issues of guest house expenses and presentation articles expenditure, but upholding the addition of excess realization on the sale of levy sugar and interest thereon.
|
