Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2005 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2005 (8) TMI 334 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved:
Disallowance of professional charges in assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Disallowance of professional charges
- The appeals were against the CIT(A)'s order for assessment years 1992-93 and 1994-95.
- The only issue was the disallowances of Rs. 5,36,234 and Rs. 3,33,771 made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A).
- The assessee-company derived income from a diagnostic center with C.T. Scan, Ultrasound, and X-ray facilities.
- The claim was for deduction of professional charges paid to three directors who were also doctors.
- The directors had a partnership specializing in Radiology and entered into agreements with the company.
- The company agreed to pay specific amounts to the doctors for restrictive covenants and services rendered.
- The company also agreed to pay a percentage of total collections to the doctors for 25 years.
- The Assessing Officer disallowed the deductions, which the CIT(A) upheld.
- The company argued that the payments were allowable expenditures and raised legal arguments based on previous court decisions.
- The DR argued for upholding the CIT(A)'s order.
- The Tribunal analyzed the agreements and payments made to the doctors.
- The Tribunal found that the impugned payments did not qualify as business expenditures under section 37(1) of the Act.
- The Tribunal discussed the legal distinction between application of income and diversion by an overriding title.
- Various legal principles and court decisions were cited to explain the concept of diversion of income.
- The Tribunal concluded that the impugned payments were not a case of diversion by an overriding charge.
- The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s orders and dismissed the appeals for both years.

This detailed analysis covers the issue of disallowance of professional charges in assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95, providing a comprehensive overview of the facts, arguments presented, legal principles discussed, and the final decision reached by the Tribunal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates