Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Wealth-tax Wealth-tax + AT Wealth-tax - 2004 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2004 (5) TMI 269 - AT - Wealth-tax

Issues:
1. Violation of rules of natural justice in passing the order under section 35 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
2. Validity of the order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 35 of the W.T. Act, 1957.
3. Adoption of the value of equity shares by the Assessing Officer.

Issue 1:
The assessee contended that the order under section 35 was passed in violation of rules of natural justice. The CWT(A) found that a show-cause notice was issued to the assessee, but there was no response. The CWT(A) rejected the claim of lack of opportunity for being heard. The ITAT upheld this finding, stating that the order was passed after due notice, and hence, the claim of violation of natural justice was unjustified.

Issue 2:
The assessee challenged the validity of the order signed by the Assessing Officer under a different designation. The ITAT noted the provisions of section 42C of the Wealth-tax Act, which allow for mistakes in proceedings if they are in conformity with the intent of the Act. The ITAT agreed with the CWT(A) that the order was valid despite the incorrect designation, as it was in line with the purpose of the Act.

Issue 3:
Regarding the adoption of the value of equity shares by the Assessing Officer, the ITAT reviewed the arguments presented. The CWT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision based on the Explanation to Rule 11 of Part C of Schedule III. The ITAT concurred with the CWT(A) that the Assessing Officer's action was justified, as it followed the provisions of the Act and the Supreme Court's interpretation. The ITAT rejected the appeal on this ground, affirming the CWT(A)'s order.

In conclusion, the ITAT dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the orders of the authorities below on all three issues raised in the appeal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates