9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of terms and conditions of trust deed for two trusts for the year 1975-76. Analysis: The judgment involves appeals by the Revenue against the orders of the AAC, Pune Range-III, Pune regarding two trusts, Smt. Gangammabai Gundappa Raghoji Trust and Raghoji Family Trust of Sholapur for the assessment year 1975-76. The trusts had similar terms and conditions in their trust deeds, with minor differences in the amount settled on trust and shares of beneficiaries in the net income. The key issue was the interpretation of the trust deed provisions concerning the distribution of income and determination of beneficiaries' shares. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) analyzed the trust deed provisions and raised two main issues: whether the individual shares of beneficiaries were determinate and whether the income was specifically receivable by the trustees on behalf of the beneficiaries. The ITO concluded that the trustees had absolute discretion to distribute the fund and accumulate income, making it a completely discretionary trust. Additionally, the ITO held that the income had not accrued to or been received for the minor beneficiaries, leading to the conclusion that the income was to be taxed in the hands of the assessee trust at the rate applicable to an "association of persons." The AAC, on appeal, held that the beneficiaries' shares were determinate and known, attracting the proviso to s. 164 of the Act. The AAC directed the ITO to tax the income of each trust at the rate appropriate for the beneficiaries' individual shares. The Revenue challenged this decision, arguing that the shares of beneficiaries were not determinate. However, considering the legal principles established by the Supreme Court in a similar case, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue's arguments and upheld the AAC's decision. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, affirming that the proviso to s. 164(1) of the Act was applicable to the trusts, and the income of each trust for the year under consideration should be taxed in the hands of the beneficiaries according to their sharing ratios. The judgment clarified the determination of beneficiaries' shares and the tax implications for the trusts based on the trust deed provisions and legal precedents.
|
