9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
The appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A) upholding the disallowance of interest paid for making interest-free advances. Details of the Judgment: The Assessing Officer (AO) observed a significant difference between the interest paid and interest received by the assessee, along with interest-free advances made. The CIT(A) noted that the assessee had surplus funds from advances received from customers, yet borrowed funds on interest to make interest-free advances to related parties. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance of interest paid by the assessee. The assessee argued citing a precedent from the Ahmedabad Bench of the Tribunal, emphasizing the overall position of funds. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities, stating that interest on borrowed funds is allowable when used for business purposes. The Tribunal found the interpretation of law by the lower authorities to be incorrect and decided to restore the issue back to the AO for further consideration. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, and the issue was remanded back to the AO for proper examination and decision after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
|
