9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (4) TMI 373 - AT - Service TaxLevy of service tax - Sales of goods or service - transactions with end users for supply of license code/keys of Kaspersky Antivirus Software in retail packs - HELD THAT - In QUICK HEAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, DELHI 2020 (1) TMI 430 - CESTAT NEW DELHI , a Division Bench of this Tribunal examined a similar controversy. The show cause notice that was issued to the appellant therein alleged that the appellant had supplied Quick Heal brand Antivirus Software key/codes to the end users through dealers/distributors without discharging the service tax liability on such transactions. It was further stated that the end user was provided with a temporary/ non-exclusive right to use the Antivirus Software as per the conditions contained in the End User License Agreement and would, therefore, not be treated as deemed sale under article 366(29A) of the Constitution. Thus, the supply of packed Antivirus Software to the end user by charging license fee would amount to a provision of service and would not be a sale. Thus, as a similar End User Licence Agreement was executed in the present case, the decisions of the Tribunal and the Supreme Court in Quick Heal Technologies would apply to the facts of the present appeal. The adjudicating authority was not justified in requiring the appellant to discharge service tax liability on transactions with end users for supply of license code/keys of Kaspersky Antivirus Software in retail packs under section 65(105)(zzzze) of the Finance Act. In view of the decision of the Tribunal and the Supreme Court in Quick Heal Technologies, the order dated 29.02.2016 passed by the Additional Director General deserves to set aside and is set aside - Appeal allowed.
Issues Involved:
1. Liability to pay service tax on transactions with end-users for the supply of license codes/keys of Kaspersky Antivirus Software. 2. Classification of the supply of Kaspersky Antivirus Software as 'information technology software' service. 3. Applicability of the Supreme Court's decision in the BSNL case and Quick Heal Technologies case. Summary: 1. Liability to Pay Service Tax: The appellant, M/s. Sakri IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd., challenged the order dated 03.03.2016 by the Additional Director General (Adjudication), Delhi-I, which confirmed the demand of service tax for the period from 01.04.2012 to 30.09.2013, invoking the proviso to section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. Penalties were also imposed u/s 78 and 77 of the Finance Act. The show cause notice alleged that the appellant supplied Kaspersky Antivirus software key/codes in retail packs to end-users without discharging service tax liability, treating these transactions as provision of service rather than sale. 2. Classification as 'Information Technology Software' Service: The adjudicating authority held that providing license code/product code in retail packs to end-users amounted to rendering 'information technology software' service defined u/s 65(53a) and taxable u/s 65(105)(zzzze) of the Finance Act. The appellant contended that the Kaspersky Antivirus Software supplied in CD form was 'goods' and not liable to service tax. The authority rejected this, stating that the appellant provided 'Information Technology Software Service' by providing license keys/codes of Antivirus Software, which does not constitute trading of goods. 3. Applicability of Supreme Court Decisions: The appellant relied on the Tribunal's decision in Quick Heal Technologies Limited vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi, which was upheld by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal in Quick Heal held that the supply of pre-packaged software in retail packs constituted a 'deemed sale' and not a service, thus not liable to service tax. The Supreme Court affirmed that once software is put on a medium and marketed, it becomes 'goods' and any transaction involving such software is a 'deemed sale' under Article 366(29A) of the Constitution, not attracting service tax. Conclusion: The Tribunal found that the End User Licence Agreement in the present case was similar to that in Quick Heal Technologies. Therefore, the adjudicating authority was not justified in requiring the appellant to discharge service tax liability on transactions with end-users for the supply of license codes/keys of Kaspersky Antivirus Software in retail packs. The order dated 29.02.2016 by the Additional Director General was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. Order Pronounced on 08.04.2024.
|
