Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2024 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (8) TMI 652 - HC - Indian Laws


Issues Involved:
1. Calculation of interest under Section 16 of the MSME Act.
2. Interpretation of "appointed day" and "monthly rests" in the context of interest calculation.
3. Whether the interest rate should be fixed or variable.
4. Applicability of estoppel against the law in the context of interest payments.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Calculation of Interest under Section 16 of the MSME Act:
The core dispute revolves around the method of calculating interest on the award amount. The petitioner argues that the interest should be calculated based on the bank rate fixed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) as on the "appointed day." In contrast, the respondent contends that the interest should be calculated based on fluctuating rates as notified by the RBI from the appointed date till the date of payment.

2. Interpretation of "Appointed Day" and "Monthly Rests":
The MSME Act defines the "appointed day" as the day following immediately after the expiry of 15 days from the day of acceptance or deemed acceptance of goods or services. The petitioner argues that the interest should be calculated based on the rate as on this appointed day. However, Section 16 of the MSME Act specifies that the interest should be compound interest with monthly rests, indicating that the interest is to be compounded at the end of each month after the appointed day.

3. Whether the Interest Rate Should Be Fixed or Variable:
The judgment delves into the nature of compound interest versus simple interest. Simple interest is calculated at a fixed rate from the commencement date till the date of payment. In contrast, compound interest involves a variable progression, with interest calculated at defined intervals (monthly rests). The court concludes that the interest rate should be variable, taking into account the bank rate notified by the RBI at the end of each month. This interpretation aligns with the concept of compound interest and the statutory language of Section 16.

4. Applicability of Estoppel Against the Law in the Context of Interest Payments:
The respondent argues that the petitioner cannot be bound to a fixed rate of interest due to prior payments made at a fixed rate, citing the principle that there cannot be any estoppel against the law. The court agrees, stating that the law as interpreted in Section 16 of the MSME Act cannot be waived by the award-debtor merely by making certain payments of interest. The court emphasizes that the executing court cannot go behind the award itself and must enforce it as per the statutory provisions.

Conclusion:
The court concludes that the interest under Section 16 of the MSME Act should be calculated at three times the RBI-notified bank rates, with the incidence of interest occurring at each monthly rest. This means that the interest rate will be variable, fluctuating with the RBI rates at each monthly interval. The award-debtor is directed to pay the interest calculated in this manner within four weeks, providing detailed calculations to the court and the award-holder. The matter will be listed for further orders on August 6, 2024, to ensure compliance.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates