2024 (9) TMI 147 - HC - Income Tax

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reasons recorded were based upon the audit objections raised by the internal audit party of the respondent department - underassessment of income - default determination of TP Adjustment - mark up on direct cost of MUK to be made at 9.17% after accounting for foreign exchange risk of 1% instead of 12% mark up was made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) - HELD THAT - TPO, while determining the ALP and making upward adjustment, has passed a detailed order wherein all aspects are taken into consideration for rendering the services by the MUK to the petitioner and thereafter, the mark up of 12% is determined. The audit objection, which has been raised with regard to foreign exchange risk by adding 1% and reducing mark up to 9.27% resulting into the upward escapement of income of more than Rs.1.60 Crore, is nothing, but a mere change of opinion as there is no failure on the part of the petitioner to make full and true disclosure of all the material facts. As the impugned notice is issued beyond the period of four years, the respondent could not have assumed the jurisdiction on the basis of the audit objections. Reduced exchange gain on sale of shares of MAP - The assessee has made full disclosure in computation of income as well as in the revised return of income during the course of regular assessment. The petitioner has explained in detail in the objections with regard to issue of transaction with MAP which has been allowed to have not been disclosed but the respondent failed to consider the same while disposing of such objection. On perusal of the material available on record, we are of the opinion that there is no failure on the part of the petitioner to disclose fully and truly all material facts at the time of original assessment and therefore, as per proviso to Section 147 of the Act, the respondent could not have assumed the jurisdiction for reopening the assessment. Decided in favour of assessee.

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Legality of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Alleged underassessment of income due to foreign exchange risk not considered in the Transfer Pricing Officer's (TPO) determination.
3. Alleged underassessment of income due to reduced exchange gain on sale of shares of MAP.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Legality of the Notice Issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

The petitioner challenged the notice dated 27th March 2021, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The petitioner argued that the notice was issued beyond the four-year period from the end of the relevant assessment year, invoking the proviso to Section 147 of the Act. The petitioner contended that there was no failure on their part to disclose fully and truly all material facts relevant for the assessment. The court found that the petitioner had made full and true disclosure of all material facts during the original assessment. Therefore, the respondent could not assume jurisdiction for reopening the assessment based on mere audit objections.

2. Alleged Underassessment of Income Due to Foreign Exchange Risk Not Considered in the TPO's Determination:

The TPO had initially determined a mark-up of 12% for the Arm's Length Price (ALP) in relation to the marketing support services provided by Mastek (UK) Limited (MUK) to the petitioner. The audit objection suggested adding a 1% foreign exchange risk, reducing the mark-up to 9.17%, resulting in an alleged underassessment of Rs. 1,60,75,800/-. The petitioner argued that this was merely a change of opinion, as the TPO had already considered all aspects, including the foreign exchange risk, in the original assessment. The court agreed with the petitioner, stating that the audit objection amounted to a mere change of opinion, and there was no failure on the part of the petitioner to disclose all material facts. Hence, the notice for reopening the assessment on this ground was not tenable.

3. Alleged Underassessment of Income Due to Reduced Exchange Gain on Sale of Shares of MAP:

The petitioner had reduced the exchange gain on the sale of MAP shares of Rs. 1,88,72,839/- from the net profit under the head "Profit and Gains of Business or Profession." The audit objection claimed that this resulted in an underassessment of income of Rs. 92,37,424/-. The petitioner contended that the exchange gain was offered to tax in the Assessment Year 2016-17, consistent with similar transactions in the Assessment Year 2011-12. The court found that the petitioner had made full disclosure in the computation of income and the revised return of income during the original assessment. The respondent failed to consider the detailed explanation and documentary evidence provided by the petitioner. Therefore, the court held that there was no failure on the part of the petitioner to disclose all material facts, and the notice for reopening the assessment on this ground was also not tenable.

Conclusion:

In view of the foregoing reasons, the court quashed and set aside the impugned notice dated 27th March 2021, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The rule was made absolute to the aforesaid extent with no order as to costs.