Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2024 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (9) TMI 253 - AT - Customs


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of EPS-ECU.
2. Classification of sub-assembly of EPS-ECU.
3. Classification of parts of EPS-ECU.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of EPS-ECU:

The primary issue in these appeals is the classification of the "Electronic Control Units for Electronic Power Steering" (EPS-ECU). The appellant classified the goods under Customs Tariff Item (CTI) 8708 9400 as parts and accessories of motor vehicles. The Revenue, however, argued that EPS-ECU should be classified under CTI 8708 94 00, which pertains to "Steering wheels, steering columns, and steering boxes; parts thereof."

The appellant's first claim was that EPS-ECU should be classified under CTI 9032 89 10 as "Electronic automatic regulators" because it regulates the voltage supplied to the motor based on the speed and torque of the vehicle. However, the Tribunal found that EPS-ECU is not an instrument or apparatus by itself but a part of the power steering system. It processes information from speed and torque sensors and regulates the assistance provided to the driver in steering. Therefore, EPS-ECU does not merit classification under CTI 9032 90 00.

The appellant's second alternative claim was for classification under CTI 8537 10 00 as "Boards, panels, consoles, desks, cabinets and other bases, equipped with two or more apparatus of heading 8535 or 8536, for electric control or the distribution of electricity." The Tribunal held that EPS-ECU is not designed for electricity distribution or electric control but is a part of the power steering system. Thus, it does not merit classification under CTI 8537 10 00.

The third alternative claim was for classification under CTI 8543 70 99 as "Electrical machines and apparatus having individual functions, not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter." The Tribunal found that EPS-ECU, being a part of an automobile specifically designed for power steering, cannot be classified in the general residual entry of electrical machines and equipment. Therefore, EPS-ECU does not merit classification under CTI 8543 70 99.

The Tribunal concluded that EPS-ECU and its sub-assembly were correctly classified under CTI 8708 94 00.

2. Classification of Sub-assembly of EPS-ECU:

The sub-assembly of EPS-ECU is essentially the same as EPS-ECU except for its cover. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant that the sub-assembly should be treated as an incomplete EPS-ECU and classified under the same CTI as the complete EPS-ECU. Therefore, the sub-assembly of EPS-ECU should also be classified under CTI 8708 94 00.

3. Classification of Parts of EPS-ECU:

The appellant argued that the parts of EPS-ECU should be classified under CTI 9032 89 90, CTI 8538 90 00, or CTI 8543 90 00, depending on the classification of the EPS-ECU itself. Since the Tribunal held that EPS-ECU does not merit classification under CTI 9032 89 10, CTI 8537 10 00, or CTI 8543 70 99, the parts of EPS-ECU consequently do not fall under CTI 9032 89 90, CTI 8538 90 00, or CTI 8543 90 00.

The Tribunal upheld the Revenue's classification of the parts of EPS-ECU under CTI 8708 94 00, as they are parts of the power steering system and thus parts of automobiles.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, classifying EPS-ECU, its sub-assembly, and its parts under CTI 8708 94 00. All 127 appeals were dismissed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates