Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1997 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1997 (1) TMI 280 - AT - Central Excise

Issues Involved: Determination of duty liability on combined production of two units, validity of show cause notice, applicability of procedural safeguards.

Duty Liability on Combined Production:
The Central Excise Officers detained stock of locks manufactured by a factory and seized similar goods claimed to be manufactured by another unit. After investigations, it was concluded that the production of these two units should be clubbed together, resulting in a duty demand for excess combined production during a specific year. The Dy. Collector confirmed the demand for past clearances and imposed duty on detained goods, along with a penalty on the factory. The Collector (Appeals) upheld this decision, leading to the filing of the present appeal.

Validity of Show Cause Notice:
The appellant argued that the two units, M/s. Gore Industries and M/s. Ogesh Industries, were separate corporate entities. It was contended that the show cause notice should have been issued to M/s. Gore Industries as well, as they were distinct entities. The absence of a show cause notice to M/s. Gore Industries was deemed a violation of natural justice principles, as it did not allow for a fair adjudication process. The failure to issue a notice to both units indicated a lack of proper consideration by the authorities, rendering the show cause notice invalid in law.

Applicability of Procedural Safeguards:
Referring to a judgment by the Bombay High Court, it was emphasized that procedural safeguards, including the issuance of a show cause notice, are essential for ensuring fairness and adherence to natural justice principles. The show cause notice in question was found to be issued for a period beyond the statutory limitation, and it was signed by an unauthorized officer, making it legally defective. Consequently, the appeal succeeded on the grounds of the invalid show cause notice and the duty demand being time-barred. The lower orders were set aside, and relief was granted to the appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates