Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1998 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1998 (3) TMI 222 - AT - Central Excise
Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility of Modvat credit on soda ash. 2. Eligibility of Modvat credit on filter paper. 3. Eligibility of Modvat credit on glass bottles. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Eligibility of Modvat Credit on Soda Ash: The appellant contested the denial of Modvat credit on soda ash used in the manufacture of aerated water. The soda ash was utilized for softening water and cleaning glass bottles. The Tribunal referenced the case of Black Diamond Beverages Ltd., which allowed Modvat credit for caustic soda used in washing glass bottles for aerated water. The Tribunal held that washing the bottles is a mandatory requirement under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955, making it an incidental or ancillary process to the completion of the manufactured product in marketable form. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the appellants are entitled to the benefit of Modvat credit for soda ash used in softening water and cleaning bottles. 2. Eligibility of Modvat Credit on Filter Paper: The appellant argued that filter paper used to filter simple sugar syrup, which is essential in the manufacture of aerated water, should qualify for Modvat credit. The Tribunal referred to the decision in Union Carbide of India v. C.C.E., Calcutta, where inputs used in machinery for the manufacture of paper were deemed eligible for Modvat credit. Applying this precedent, the Tribunal held that filter paper used in the process of manufacturing aerated water qualifies as an input under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Consequently, the appellants are entitled to Modvat credit for filter paper. 3. Eligibility of Modvat Credit on Glass Bottles: The appellant claimed Modvat credit on glass bottles under the inclusive definition of "input" in Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Collector (Appeals) had remanded the matter for detailed study concerning the classification of glass bottles as fixed assets by examining the balance sheet. The Tribunal noted that the bottles are essential for the marketability of aerated water, which is subject to a specific rate of duty. The Tribunal emphasized that glass bottles are necessary inputs for the final product's manufacture and should be eligible for Modvat credit, provided that the authorities ensure no repeated credit is availed for the same bottles. The Tribunal also referenced Trade Notices and Board's Circulars affirming the eligibility of Modvat credit for glass bottles used for aerated water. However, since the matter was remanded and no final action was recorded, the Tribunal did not examine this aspect further but allowed the appellants to raise all legal and factual pleas before the adjudicating authority. Conclusion: The Tribunal concluded that the appellants are entitled to Modvat credit for soda ash used in softening water and cleaning bottles, and filter paper used in the manufacturing process of aerated water. Regarding glass bottles, the Tribunal acknowledged their essential role in the manufacturing process and marketability of aerated water, implying eligibility for Modvat credit, but deferred detailed examination pending further action by the adjudicating authority. The appeal was disposed of in these terms.
|