Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1998 (8) TMI 291 - AT - Central Excise
Issues:
1. Dispute over assessable value of toothpaste brands. 2. Inclusion of advertising expenses in assessable value. 3. Interpretation of agreement terms between manufacturer and buyer. Issue 1 - Dispute over assessable value of toothpaste brands: The case involved an appeal by a manufacturer against an order partly allowing and disallowing an appeal filed against an Order-in-Original. The appellant manufactured 'Babool Toothpaste', 'Promise Toothpaste', and 'Promise Toothpowder', selling to BHPL and wholesale dealers. The dispute arose regarding the assessable value based on prices charged by BHPL to wholesale dealers. Issue 2 - Inclusion of advertising expenses in assessable value: The disagreement centered on whether advertising expenses incurred by BHPL should be included in the assessable value of 'Babool Toothpaste'. The lower authorities approved the inclusion, citing precedents. However, the Tribunal referred to various decisions to conclude that such expenses should not be included in the assessable value, emphasizing the terms of the agreement and the absence of an obligation on the buyer to advertise. Issue 3 - Interpretation of agreement terms between manufacturer and buyer: The Tribunal analyzed the agreement terms between the manufacturer and BHPL, highlighting that the agreement did not mandate the buyer to incur advertising expenses. The agreement allowed BHPL to market the product under the manufacturer's name but did not impose an obligation to advertise. The Tribunal held that including advertising expenses in the assessable value was unjustified based on the agreement terms and relevant legal precedents. In summary, the judgment resolved the dispute by ruling in favor of the appellant, setting aside the inclusion of advertising expenses in the assessable value of 'Babool Toothpaste'. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of the agreement terms, trade practices, and legal precedents, emphasizing the absence of an obligation on the buyer to incur such expenses.
|