Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + SC VAT and Sales Tax - 1960 (9) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1960 (9) TMI 86 - SC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
1. Validity of sales tax assessment for the quarters prior to and ending on December 31, 1949.
2. Liability of the assessee for sales tax for post-Constitution quarters.
3. Legality of notification extending Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 to Kalahandi.
4. Refund of fees paid by the respondent.
5. Validity of fees realized under rule 59 of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, 1947.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal from the High Court of Orissa regarding the sales tax assessment of a forest contractor in Orissa. The contractor was assessed for sales tax for eight quarters, during which he collected goods from the forest and sold them outside Orissa. The High Court held that the notification extending the Sales Tax Act to Kalahandi was invalid, and the contractor was not liable for sales tax for quarters ending on December 31, 1949, and post-Constitution quarters under Article 286 of the Constitution. The High Court ordered a refund of fees paid by the contractor. However, the appellants argued that a previous decision set aside the High Court's ruling on the notification and that the contractor was rightly assessed for quarters before December 31, 1949. The Supreme Court found the assessment orders valid for quarters before December 31, 1949, but invalid for subsequent quarters. The High Court's order for fee refund was set aside, and the certificate proceedings were restricted to valid tax quarters only. The Supreme Court also clarified the validity of fees realized under rule 59 of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, 1947. The appeal was allowed in part, with no order for costs in the Supreme Court.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates