TDS credit to be allowed to Employee even if not deposited by the Employer

[CA Bimal Jain]

The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in KARTIK VIJAYSINH SONAVANE VERSUS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 8 [2021 (11) TMI 682 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] directed the Income-Tax Department (“the Department”) to allow tax deducted at source (“TDS”) credit to the assessee, even if the same is not deposited by the employer. Further held that, where tax has been deducted by an employer but not paid to the Central Government, the Department should resort to Section 201 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act”) to recover TDS from the employer.

Facts:

Kartik Vijaysinh Sonavane (“the Petitioner”) is a pilot with Kingfisher Airlines (“the Employer”) that deducted TDS from the salary income of the Petitioner amounting to INR 7,20,100/- for the Assessment Year 2009-10 and INR 8,70,757/- for the Assessment Year 2011-12 respectively. However, the TDS amount had not been deposited by the Employer in the Central Government Account. Accordingly, the TDS credit as claimed by the Petitioner was denied by the Assessing Officer (“the Respondent”/ “AO”). The Respondent raised demand vide several demand notices with interest and initiated recovery proceedings.

Being aggrieved, the Petitioner has filed this writ petition against recovery notices.

Issue:

Whether the Respondent can deny the benefit of TDS deducted by the Employer during the relevant financial years?

Held:

The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in KARTIK VIJAYSINH SONAVANE VERSUS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 8 [2021 (11) TMI 682 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT]  held as under:

• Relied on its own decision in case of DEVARSH PRAVINBHAI PATEL VERSUS ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 5 (1) (1) [2018 (9) TMI 1635 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] wherein, the Court allowed the petition filed by the assessee, who was an employee of the Kingfisher Airlines and worked as a pilot and the TDS on the salary paid  to the assessee had not been deposited, and the Department raised the tax demand with interest and initiated the actions of the recovery.
• Opined that, no separate reasoning are desirable as the facts being almost identical.
• Observed that, a perusal of Section 205 of the IT Act clarifies that where tax is deductible at source, the assessee shall not be called upon to pay the tax himself to the extent to which tax has been deducted from that income. Further, if the amount has been deducted but not paid to the Central Government, that eventuality is taken care of by Section 201 of the IT Act. It is not permissible to proceed against the assessee even after deduction of TDS.
• Held that, the Department is precluded from denying the benefit of the TDS by the employer during the relevant financial years to the Petitioner.
• Directed the Respondent to credit the tax to the Petitioner and in case of any recovery or adjustments, the Petitioner shall be entitled to a refund of the same along with the statutory interest, within 8 weeks.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])