Article Section | |||||||||||
Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST CA Bimal Jain Experts This |
|||||||||||
Recipient not eligible for ITC of GST paid on transfer of rights of leasehold land |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Recipient not eligible for ITC of GST paid on transfer of rights of leasehold land |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
The AAR, Gujarat, in the case of IN RE: M/S. BAYER VAPI P. LTD. - 2023 (9) TMI 165 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT ruled that the transferee acquiring the rights of the lease for construction of the immovable property is not entitled to take Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) of the Goods and Service Tax (“GST”) paid by them on the services received by the Transferor by way of the lease as per Section 17(5)(d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”). Facts: M/s Bayer Vapi Private Limited (“the Applicant”) is engaged in the manufacturing of chemicals for agriculture and health science applications, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with M/s Vapi Enterprises Ltd. (“the Transferor”) for transferring the rights of lease of the leasehold land owned by Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (“the Owner”). As per the terms of the MOU, Applicant intended to use the aforesaid land to set up/expand its manufacturing facility for the manufacture of chemicals to be used by the Applicant in the course or furtherance of its business of manufacturing. The Applicant filed an application before the AAR, Gujarat seeking clarification regarding eligibility to claim ITC of the GST paid on services received by way of lease to set up/expand its manufacturing facility. Issue: Whether the Applicant is eligible to claim the ITC of the GST paid by them for acquiring the rights of lease from the Transferor as service for the construction of Immovable Property? Held: The AAR, Gujarat in IN RE: M/S. BAYER VAPI P. LTD. - 2023 (9) TMI 165 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT held as under:
Our Comments: As per Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, the advance ruling is binding upon those cases in which the rights of the lease have been acquired to set up/expand its manufacturing facility in the course or furtherance of its business or manufacturing and the said intent has been clearly expressed. In IN RE: M/S. DAICEL CHIRAL TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED - 2020 (8) TMI 103 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, HYDERABAD TELANGANA the Telangana Authority for Advance Ruling relying upon Section 17(5)(d) has opined that the applicant is not eligible to avail the Input Tax Credit of GST paid on payment of Lease Premium Charges (one time charges), annual lease rentals (recurring) and GST paid on maintenance collected by the Lessor towards the supply of land on lease for furtherance/expansion of business. Relevant Sections: Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act: “17(5)(d) goods or services or both received by a taxable person for construction of an immovable property (other than plant or machinery) on his own account including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business.” (Author can be reached at [email protected])
By: CA Bimal Jain - October 6, 2023
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||