Article Section | |||||||||||||||||||
Service Tax on Builder / Developer |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Service Tax on Builder / Developer |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Background Levy of Service Tax on Residential / Commercial Construction has been matter of dispute which was settled by virtue of Notification No. 29/2010 dated 22nd June 2010 content of which is reproduced below:
Hence by issuing above notification Govt has been construction service liable for service tax and onus of payment was on builder / developer. As per above notification builders / developers were made liable to pay service tax @25% of effective rate of service tax. Further above notification make clear that abetment is not available in case value of land is not included in the amount charged to the customer. Changes in Rate of Service Tax for Construction Service
for a residential unit satisfying any one of the followingconditions, namely:– (i) the carpet area of the unit is upto 2000 square feet; or (ii) the amount charged for the unit is less than rupees one crore; then rate of Service Tax was 25% of effective rate of Service Tax otherwise it was 30% of effective rate of Service Tax including commercial construction. for a residential unit satisfying both the following conditions, namely:– (i) the carpet area of the unit is less 2000 square feet; and (ii) the amount charged forthe unit is less than rupeesone crore; then rate of Service Tax was 25% of effective rate of Service Tax otherwise it was 30% of effective rate of Service Tax including commercial construction. Further to harmonize the rate of service that on Residential and Commercial Construction abetment @70% has been introduced in Budget 2016 making effective rate of @30% of 14.5%. Recently Delhi High Court in case of Suresh Kumar Bansal v. UOI 2016 (6) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT has held that Construction Service not liable to service tax for a period prior to 1st July 2012. The judgment of court is based on the ground that there is no valuation mechanism prescribed in the law and rate of service tax prescribed by notification is not valid. During the course of appeal Respondents has failed to draw the attention of the Court to Section 93(1) which is as follow: Sub Section 1 – If the Central Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, it may, by notification in the Official Gazette, exempt generally or subject to such conditions as may be specified in the notification, taxable service of any specified description from the whole or any part of the service tax leviable thereon. Hence by virtue of above power Central Government has issued Notification No. 29/2010-ST dated 22nd June 2010 read with Notification No 1/2006-ST dated 1st March 2006 making construction services liable for service tax @25% of effective rate of service tax. On the basis of above, the stand taken by Delhi High Court that rate of service tax cannot be determined by way of notification is bad in law. Further in the judgment court was of the view that as the consideration include value of land and hence valuation mechanism fail however due importance is not given to the above notifications where it was clearly mention that abated rate is applicable only in case if value of land is included in the gross amount charged. Further, in the above judgment as well as in case of Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry and Another v. UOI and Others (Bombay High Court) both courts has accepted that construction undertaken by the developer is a service, levy of service tax on construction services in as per the Constitution of India and developers are liable for service tax on construction service. Furthermore, above decision given by Delhi High Court is for a period prior to July 2012. From July 2012 with introduction of Negative List, all the services other than those specified in the negative list and those exempt from service tax, shall be liable for service tax.
By: Santosh thapliyal - June 27, 2016
Discussions to this article
Dear Sir, There is no doubt about applicability of Service Tax on account of various services involved in construction of residential flats and sale thereof.
Sir, the article is nicely written. This shows that either an applicant or respondent whoever has argument power who can convince the Authority will win the battle.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||