Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2013 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (6) TMI 344 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
- Denial of CENVAT credit on sulphuric acid used for treating effluents in the effluent treatment plant.
- Whether treatment of gases effluents is an essential part of manufacturing of chemicals.
- Entitlement to input credit on sulphuric acid under Rule 2(K) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

Analysis:
1. The appellants appealed against the denial of CENVAT credit on sulphuric acid used in treating effluents in the effluent treatment plant. The impugned order stated that the treatment of effluents did not have a nexus with the final product, leading to the denial of credit.

2. The judge dismissed the application for early hearing as the stay application was listed on the same day, rendering it infructuous. The judge then waived the requirement of pre-deposit due to the issue's narrow scope and proceeded with the appeal for disposal.

3. The appellants, as manufacturers of various chemicals, were required by the Central Pollution Control Board to install an effluent treatment plant to treat harmful gases emitted during the manufacturing process. The treatment of these gases was deemed an essential part of the manufacturing process, without which production could not take place.

4. The judge noted that the use of sulphuric acid for treating effluents in the effluent treatment plant was directly related to the manufacturing process of the final products, such as Nickel Catalyst and Noble Metal Catalyst. Therefore, the appellants were entitled to input credit on sulphuric acid under Rule 2(K) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

5. Consequently, the judge set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, granting the appellants consequential relief. The stay application was also disposed of accordingly, in favor of the appellants.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates