2014 (6) TMI 10 - AT - Income Tax

Deletion of addition by adoption of FMV fair market value of land as on 01.04.1981 - Held that - CIT(A) rightly was of the view that the circle rate of the land in the area was Rs.125 to Rs.200/- per sq yard for new location and Rs.175to Rs.275/- per sq yard for old location the AO did not accept the circle rate on the ground that the order of the ADM(Finance) furnished by the assessee is without signature and the present incumbent of that office has refused to provide a certified copy of the notification - the assessee could get the notification of circle rate under the Right to Information Act - the circle rate of Meerut was Rs. 125 to 200/- per sq yard for new location and Rs. 175 to Rs.275/- per sq yard for old location - the assessee has adopted rate of Rs.135/- per sq yard - a copy of notification was already produced by the assessee before the AO who refused to accept it because it was not signed by ADM(Finance) - the assessee has obtained the certified copy of the notification under the Right to Information Act - Considering the circle rate fixed by ADM (Finance) for the purpose of levy of stamp duty on sale of land in that area, the fair market value of land adopted by CIT(A) at Rs.135/- per sq. yard cannot be said to be excessive or unreasonable thus, there is no justification to interfere with the order of the CIT(A) Decided against Revenue.

Issues:
1. Determination of fair market value of land for computing capital gain.
2. Validity of adopting circle rate for land situated outside urban limits.
3. Discrepancy in fair market value adopted by the assessee compared to the value in sale deed.
4. Compliance with Right to Information Act for obtaining circle rate notification.

Analysis:
1. The primary issue in this case revolves around the determination of the fair market value (FMV) of land for computing capital gain. The Assessing Officer (AO) valued the land at Rs.22 per square yard, while the assessee claimed Rs.135 per square yard as the FMV as on 01.04.1981. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) directed the AO to accept the FMV at Rs.135 per square yard based on various justifications, including the circle rates notified by the ADM (Finance) and precedents set by higher authorities. The CIT(A) found the AO's valuation arbitrary and unsupported by facts, leading to the allowance of the assessee's appeal.

2. Another issue raised was the validity of applying urban circle rates to land situated outside urban limits. The CIT(A) justified the adoption of circle rates for the area based on the information obtained under the Right to Information Act, which revealed the circle rates applicable to the location of the land in question. The tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing the relevance of the obtained information in determining the reasonableness of the FMV adopted.

3. A discrepancy in the fair market value adopted by the assessee compared to the value in the sale deed was also highlighted. The CIT(A) considered various factors such as the location of the land, its proximity to amenities, and the presence of trees on the property to justify the FMV of Rs.135 per square yard. The tribunal concurred with the CIT(A)'s reasoning and dismissed the revenue's appeal, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant factors in determining the FMV for tax purposes.

4. Lastly, the compliance with the Right to Information Act for obtaining the circle rate notification was a crucial aspect of the case. The tribunal acknowledged the assessee's efforts in obtaining the necessary information and deemed it sufficient for validating the adopted FMV. By considering the circle rates fixed by the ADM (Finance) for stamp duty purposes, the tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision and dismissed the revenue's appeal, emphasizing the importance of proper documentation and compliance with legal procedures in tax assessments.

← Previous Next →