Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2014 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (9) TMI 566 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
1. Classification of handheld electronic ticketing machines under H.S.N. Code 8471 for tax purposes.

Analysis:
The judgment revolves around the classification of handheld electronic ticketing machines for tax purposes. The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and selling handheld electronic ticketing machines, claimed that their product falls under H.S.N. Code 8471, making it eligible for a 4% tax rate as an IT product. However, the assessing authority, appellate authority, and Tribunal disagreed, holding that the product does not fall under the specified category and should be taxed at 12.5%.

The core question before the court was whether the portable hand-held electronic ticketing machine qualifies as an IT product falling under heading and sub-heading No.8471 for taxation at 4%. The technical specifications of the machine were detailed, emphasizing its hardware components, software capabilities, and applications in electronic ticketing, among others. The assessee argued that the product should be classified as an IT product under Schedule-III Item No.53 for the benefit of a 4% tax rate.

The court analyzed the relevant notification dated 31.3.2006, which classified goods under specific headings and sub-headings from the Central Excise Tariff Act as IT products. The court compared the descriptions in the notification with those in the Tariff Act to determine the eligibility for the 4% tax rate. It was noted that while the product description in the Tariff Act included ticket-issuing machines under 8470, the specific mention of "not elsewhere specified or included" in 8471 excluded such machines. The judgment highlighted the commercial understanding of the product, as described by the assessee and customers, and emphasized the importance of commercial parlance in classification.

Ultimately, the court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, concluding that the handheld ticketing machine did not fall under H.S.N. Code 8471 for a 4% tax rate. The judgment cited the principle of classification based on commercial understanding and marketability, supporting the tax assessment at 12.5%. Consequently, the revision petitions were dismissed, affirming the tax treatment of the product as per the prevailing classification under the Central Excise Tariff Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates