Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2014 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (10) TMI 229 - AT - Customs


Issues: Classification of imported goods under Customs Tariff Act, Duty liability of 100% EOU, Authority of Chemical Examiner in classification, Acceptance of exporter's certificate, Interpretation of LOP for import

Classification of Goods:
The appellant, a manufacturing unit in SEZ, imported Mixed Plastic Scrap classified as Carpet by Chemical Examiner. The First Appellate Authority upheld this classification under Chapter Heading 5702.32 based on the examiner's report. However, the Tribunal found the examiner's classification beyond their mandate, emphasizing they should only provide findings, not classification. The appellant argued the goods were for conversion into plastic granules, supported by an exporter's certificate. The LOP granted to the appellant allowed import of plastic materials for conversion and re-export, indicating the goods should be classified under Chapter 3915.00, not 5702.32.

Duty Liability of 100% EOU:
The appellant, being a 100% EOU, claimed no duty liability on the imported goods. Despite communication to take back the seized goods, they remained with the appellant. The Tribunal considered the duty liability issue in light of the appellant's EOU status and the purpose of importing the goods for conversion and re-export.

Authority of Chemical Examiner:
The Tribunal highlighted that the Chemical Examiner's role is limited to providing findings, not classifying the products. In this case, the examiner's classification of the goods as Carpet under 5702.32 was deemed beyond their scope. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper classification based on the nature and purpose of the imported goods, not solely on the examiner's report.

Acceptance of Exporter's Certificate:
The Tribunal noted the certificate from the exporter indicating the material was post-processed industrial material for conversion into granules. This certificate supported the appellant's claim that the goods were intended for conversion and re-export, aligning with the purpose stated in the LOP. The Tribunal considered this certificate in assessing the classification of the imported goods.

Interpretation of LOP for Import:
The LOP granted to the appellant permitted the import of various plastic materials for conversion and re-export. The Tribunal analyzed the LOP terms, which included importing plastic wastes like flakes, powders, and irregular sheets. Based on the chemical analysis indicating the goods were made of Polyamide yarn, the Tribunal concluded that the goods should be classified under Chapter 3915.00, suitable for crushing into granules for re-export.

In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal based on the correct classification of the imported goods under Chapter 3915.00 of the Customs Tariff Act 1975, considering the appellant's EOU status, the purpose of import, and the exporter's certificate.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates