2014 (10) TMI 790 - HC - Income Tax

Disallowance on interest expenses in interest free advances given to sister concern deleted Held that - The Tribunal rightly relied upon B & A Plantations Industries Ltd. vs. CIT 1999 (12) TMI 43 - GAUHATI High Court for the principle that where no interest was charged on the interest free loans to sister concerns, there is no income to be charged as notional income on accrual basis also in CIT vs. Surji Vallabhdas & Co. 1962 (3) TMI 6 - SUPREME Court it has been held that where income has, in fact, been received and is subsequently given up in circumstances that it remains the income of the recipient, even though given up, the tax may be payable - where the income can be said not to have resulted at all, there is obviously neither accrual nor receipt of income, even though an entry to that effect might have been made in the books of account thus, the order of the Tribunal is upheld Decided against revenue.

Summary

Issues:
1. Addition of interest income on advance made to sister concern.

Analysis:
The case involved an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, where the Revenue challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs. 39,86,000 on account of interest income on advance made by the assessee to its sister concern. The Assessing Officer had made the addition based on the auditor's comments that no interest was charged on total advances. The assessee contended that the advances were interest-free loans. The CIT(A) ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that notional interest income could not be taxed in the absence of interest being charged. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, citing precedents and emphasizing that no income could be charged if no interest was being levied on interest-free loans to sister concerns.

The CIT(A) and the Tribunal relied on the decision of Gauhati High Court in B & A Plantations Industries Ltd. vs. CIT for the principle that no income should be charged as notional income on accrual basis when no interest is being charged on interest-free loans to sister concerns. The Apex Court's decision in CIT vs. Surji Vallabhdas & Co. further clarified that income tax is levied on actual income received or accrued, and not on hypothetical income that does not materialize. Therefore, if income does not result at all, there should be no tax liability, even if there is an entry in the books of account.

In conclusion, the Tribunal did not err in upholding the deletion of the addition, as there was no actual income generated from the interest-free loans. The appeal was deemed meritless, and no substantial question of law was found to be considered by the court. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.